Quote:
Originally Posted by dlk9s
That seems to basically be the book every year on the highly ranked teams that have one-and-done or two-and-done top high school recruits. Those guys are generally just gifted, athletic players who don't learn to really play in high school. In college, a bunch of those kids together have trouble learning, especially defensively, quickly enough.
I'm sure I'm way over-generalizing.
Those teams still win a ton because the players are so good and the coaches are among the best, but a "lesser" team that is disciplined and efficient can beat them.
This is true. However, I think there's a clear difference in being raw versus not understanding basic things like 3 > 2. When you see major failures of the latter, it's more an indictment of the coaching. Kentucky is one of those teams that routinely passes open 3's to take one step in. And because they don't understand how offense is supposed to work, they also get confused on defense when teams are executing well.
Cal's offense is basically iso ball but with no space to actually create anything. The little bit of "motion" they run on the wing is slow and sloppy. The screens aren't crisp and it appears to have no objective other than "get a different guy the ball out top." They aren't looking for backdoor cuts, slip screens, rolls, pops, or anything really. It's just dribble dribble until clock then somebody forces a horrible, contested chuck.
Putting them in a motion offense with no objectives and asking them to "create" is like the worst possible environment. They are going to revert to the dumb hero ball **** they're used to since that's all they've ever done. Teams like this would do better if they had a few strict rules that put them into good spots like forcing switches and THEN asking them to create. Defense is harder.