Quote:
Originally Posted by ligastar
what reasonable rules are you looking for the NCAA to put in action and have enforced? am i missing something obvious?
the NCAA isn't interested in inviting additional legal challenges after having egg thrown on their faces is such a dramatic and public fashion. any rule that precludes or delays athletes from getting paid would be a non-starter imo.
the NCAA doesn't want their legitimacy challenged anymore than it already has.
It's not unreasonable to have a rule that you can't tamper with players
on the rosters of other teams -- that's why we have the transfer portal. You can contact guys in the portal all you want. Same for recruits. I just don't want a scenario where Cal calls up Armando Bacot and says "hey, I know you just announced you were going back to UNC, how about $5 mill to come play for us?".
It's a rule in every professional league that I know of, so it's not like it's some revolutionary concept. The NCAA maybe (probably) even has that rule already on the books. Nobody -- not the SCOTUS, not the public, not anyone -- is going to object. At least not seriously. It doesn't impede the ability of players to move or get paid if that's what they want to do. Just declare for the portal and go crazy.
But of course that contact will happen through intermediaries anyway, thus the /shrug.