Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
The Markkanen contract is fine but the Nance contract was a steal, it's very odd to use a good player on a positive value contract as the matching salary filler to get a less good player on a less positive contract.
Wait, salary filler? It's just a straight swap from Cavs point of view isn't it? Both picks are from POR aren't they?
The way I'm looking at it, if it had've just been a two team with Lauri going to POR I'd like it for both teams, Bulls front court is crowded and POR need bigs. Cavs stepping in and swapping Nance for Lauri makes it even better for POR, and Lauri makes a little more sense for what Cavs are doing than Nance, but it is still a little odd, you'd think trying to get picks or a back court player from someone would've been a better use