Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
lol @ this
Most of the days since the start of the season have been off days.
If Boogie had sat out one of the 48 games then he wouldn't be overplayed? What if the 'Cans schedule had only had 47 games to this point? Or what if it had 49 games and he sat out one of them?
another reference point would be LMA, playing for one of the sharpest teams on rest management.
Spurs 51 total games, LMA has played 48. And averaging 34 MPG.
I think something in this ballpark is more efficient than starting 100% of games and playing 36 minutes.
It's a minor but important distinction and ones that sharper teams have been paying attention to for a while.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidcolin
Unless you have access to any actual data regarding boogie's level of fatigue (cortisol levels, reaction times, current nagging injuries, subjective 'how you feeling?' type questionnaire, etc etc), then you are talking completely out of your ass.
broad data suggests that there is skill when it comes to injury luck. sharp teams are investing large sums of money toward top notch medical teams and medical analytics.
teams like the pelicans and wolves are going to be forever behind the curve as long as their current management is in place, and when all their starters are eventually injury-riddled corpses (see: joakim noah, luol deng, derrick rose) i will be quick to point out the absurdity in people's argument that number of minutes and rest days somehow don't matter.