i keep seeing these melo <-> tatum comparisons.
on some level, i get it. they both came out of college looking like they had a lot of mid-range jump shooting and iso-based offense.
and maybe in some other world, on some other team, that would be tatum. but in this world, it just isnt.
shot dashboards:
tatum:
http://stats.nba.com/player/1628369/shots-dash/
melo:
http://stats.nba.com/player/2546/shots-dash/
a few numbers jump out to me (all comparisons are tatum - melo):
shot % where touched for 6+ seconds: 3.7 - 13.9
shot % where dribbled 7+ times: 2.9 - 7.6
shot % where dribbled 3-6 times: 14.7 - 17.3
so melo is taking a ton more possessions where he is a total ball stopper (i really wish these #s could remove transition buckets, my eye test tells me that tatum is the primary ball handler a decent amount in transition, not sure how often that applies on a RUSS team).
lets look at where they shoot from:
shot % of 3s: 32 - 40
shot % inside 10ft: 47.8 - 12.7 (!!!) (to be far, melo shot a ton more in earlier years, a fairer number here is probably in the 20s or 30s)
so melo takes a ton of his shots from mid range (always has, although its gotten worse), and tatum takes very few because he's too busy taking bitches to the rim on a regular basis.
he's a much more willing and capable defender, capable of switching screens (super valuable in modern NBA), and helping protect the rim. and he doesnt turn the ball over.
tatum's 1% outcome is more like a less good kevin durant.
(also, passing is definitely his weakness.)