Quote:
Originally Posted by Clayton
my primary issue with the smart guys who are lonzo haters is i think they underestimate growth and development in rookie players.
you can outline all the well thought out and reasoned opinions on lonzo's flaws, but it's not like he's incapable of fixing a lot of these things at the age of 20. it's a long grind.
i'm clearly tossing out some biased names here, but look at kyle lowry. it took him like 6 years to "figure it out". look at gary harris. probably legitimately the worst player in the league his rookie season. gets extended for 4/84M.
i agree growth is an underrated aspect of rookie evaluation when stats are getting thrown around, but idk that lowry is a good example. lowry had a pretty good reputation as a back up iirc, but the grizz had just drafted conley. some advanced stats were high on him even in his time with the grizzlies-- maybe no surprise that the rockets took a chance on him-- though he was known more as a defensive player at that time. lowry certainly developed considerably to become the player he has, but i don't think it took that long for him to become a positive contributor
gary harris just seems like a huge exception. if he was a high lotto pick, i'd probably feel differently but i can't imagine there are many instances of players with his draft status and player role being that bad year 1 and panning out. good for him though