Quote:
Originally Posted by C-Viggity
Lonzo will and should get plenty of slack cause we have seen the elite bbiq and vision on display at college summer league and is definitely running bad. However I’d say evidence points to him just not being a good shooter yet and combined with other offensive holes, he’s one of the worst players in the NBA today. Think that’s fair to say and still think there’s potential.
Ball should be evaluated in relative and not just absolute terms. First is whether or not Danny Ainge looks correct in trading down to take Tatum rather than take Ball or Fultz because the value of the pick he received is bigger than the gap between Tatum and the best of Ball/Fultz. Second, does Ball look good relative to the other PGs taken in the top ten: Fultz, Fox, Ntilikina, and DSJ?
At draft time, the consensus was "lol Ainge". That seems to have shifted, partly due to Tatum being good, but also to Fultz and Ball being not good, so that maybe that trade doesn't look so bad and might even look good to some people. After 11-12 games, how do you rank those five PGs?