Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NBA Season Thread 2016-2017 NBA Season Thread 2016-2017

03-04-2017 , 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Insert Witty SN-
earl thomas sucks

that is all
Seahawks seemed to miss him.
03-04-2017 , 09:30 PM
Everybody already knew it from the start of the season, but Festus Ezeli is officially full BUM and out for the year with knee surgery.
03-04-2017 , 09:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heroball
Seahawks seemed to miss him.

lol

earl WATSON
03-05-2017 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin
Whatever the worst move is regarding the Knicks pick, will happen.

I believe that Phil Jackson is actively trying to get fired, so he can collect the rest of his contract without doing any work or being in New York.
he was trying hard not to get hired but then Dolan agreed to all of his demands
03-05-2017 , 05:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpha Fish
he was trying hard not to get hired but then Dolan agreed to all of his demands


Oakley as head coach 1time
03-05-2017 , 05:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by minnesotasam
gtfo with your unbiased assessments. This is the NuggZilla thread.
It was actually biased but I didn't expect Geoffras to know the my team like I do.

I will take back everything I said about Minnesota and Wiggins if they can just win their next game, we might need it after that performance tonight
03-06-2017 , 05:32 AM
Im not saying IT isnt one of the worst defensive PGs in the league, but hes getting underrated by DRPM and on/off splits this year because of 3 point % defense which isn't something the defenders have much control over.

Coming into this season when Thomas has been on the court for Boston the opponent has only shot 32.2% on 3s with him on the court. During those same seasons the Celtics opponents have shot 34.4% when he wasnt playing.

This season when hes on the court the other team shoots 35.3% from 3 as opposed to 30.1% from 3 when he sits. It accounts for about a 1.45/100 swing in defensive rating.

Last edited by Moneyball16; 03-06-2017 at 05:39 AM.
03-06-2017 , 07:48 AM
Well isn't it easier to shoot over a midget ?
03-06-2017 , 08:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinarocket
Well isn't it easier to shoot over a midget ?
Tyler Ullis a midget himself would say so. Figuring he had a career night last night on IT2. Also with the game winner in his face.

03-06-2017 , 09:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyball16
Im not saying IT isnt one of the worst defensive PGs in the league, but hes getting underrated by DRPM and on/off splits this year because of 3 point % defense which isn't something the defenders have much control over.

Coming into this season when Thomas has been on the court for Boston the opponent has only shot 32.2% on 3s with him on the court. During those same seasons the Celtics opponents have shot 34.4% when he wasnt playing.

This season when hes on the court the other team shoots 35.3% from 3 as opposed to 30.1% from 3 when he sits. It accounts for about a 1.45/100 swing in defensive rating.
I think you have to be careful here to not just assume randomness. Really, you need to know a lot more than we do (publicly, at least) about shot location and openness of those shots. That's generally what affects shooting percentage, and we don't have those on/off numbers afaik. It could be that the Celtics are running bad with him on the floor, but it could just as easily be a product of the types of shots that the Celtics are giving up when he's on the floor.
03-06-2017 , 09:27 AM
I tried to pull up some corner 3 numbers via nbawowy, but the numbers don't match up at all to a bunch of other data, so I'm not comfortable using those.
03-06-2017 , 10:34 AM
Tyler Ulis is shooting 31.3% at the rim this season. With a 350+ minute sample has anyone seen lower than that?
03-06-2017 , 10:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyball16
Tyler Ulis is shooting 31.3% at the rim this season. With a 350+ minute sample has anyone seen lower than that?
Looked at basically every white PG and mediocre small PG.

Rubio was close in one of his injury plagued seasons with 33.3%. Napier did it last year with 26% and 600 minutes last year lol.
03-06-2017 , 12:53 PM
Pulling this from the game thread because I think it could make for an interesting discussion:

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffRas22
Then you are, imo, underrating the value of being able to carry a really high USG and remain efficient. Also you're just underrating how good Thomas has been this year. Remove Iverson's rookie year and here's what his statline during his run in Philly (prime years where he was carrying a heavy offensive burden) looked like compared to Thomas this year:

Iverson '97-'06: 22.1 PER, 51.2% TS, 29% AST, 11.5% TOV%, 34% USG
Thomas '16-'17: 26.8 PER, 62.1% TS, 33.7% AST, 10.7% TOV%, 34.3% USG

What Thomas is doing is far from easily replaceable.

One more thing, your argument has a lot more credence with Iverson or Derrick Rose in 2010-2011, because those were teams that were great because of their defenses- 5th & 1st in DRTG respectively. This year's Celtics are 7th in ORTG & 17th in DRTG so they are winning with offense. Now you could obviously make the argument that they are underachieving defensibly compared to their personnel, and a big reason for that is Thomas, but any negative on that side of the ball is clearly being more than made up for by the heights he raises that offense to.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadood228
This is a good take, I feel like we've swung the pendulum too far in the other direction when it comes to rating IT2.

With that said, I think their best bet is to NOT max him when his next contract is up, hopefully by then whomever they get to play point, and it looks like that's where they will draft, will be at least up to snuff enough to somewhat mitigate the loss of IT2.

I know some would say "but why don't they get something for him then" and I just don't agree. When your team is on an upward trajectory you just don't take a step back unless the future gains are immense, and the way Boston has managed their assets they will be on an upward trajectory for the next half decade or so minimum, imo.
I get what you guys are saying here, but I tend to think the opposite is true. Iverson and Rose could get away with playing bad defense because they had a good defense around them and their bad defense wasn't a hindrance.

With Isaiah, it's just not the case. It's not necessarily his fault that he doesn't have a better defense around him, but it's a reality. And, because of it, his bad defense hurts more and more negatively affects his value.
03-06-2017 , 01:01 PM
Looking at some other guys, Brevin Knight was at 28% his last year in the league. A lot of the very bad finishers(like if you look at unathletic small shooters, Damon Jones types) basically never shoot at the rim except in fast break situations, it takes real moxie to keep going to the hole when you can't finish.
03-06-2017 , 01:08 PM
Smart, Bradley, and Crowder are all good defenders, though. Amir Johnson isn't a shotblocker but he's not bad, either. Horford and Olynyk are soft, and their only real rim protector type is Zeller who is like a 10th man, but IT2 is clearly a big part of why the Celtics aren't good at defense when they have a fair number of positive individual defenders.
03-06-2017 , 01:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8bus
Derrick Williams to be signed for the rest of the season
man, I remember when the cavs binked the no1 pick in that draft and also had the 4 and I was dreaming of scenarios to land irving and dwill. like trading some combo of future picks, vareajao, and whoever else had value. I really really really wanted williams. pretty crazy that hes now on the cavs.

he had a pretty sick run in the ncaa tourney. nailing 3s and dunking all over the place.
03-06-2017 , 01:41 PM
Something about DWill2 that makes me cautiously optimistic about sustaining his good play:

He has only taken 4 shots between 3 feet and the three point line since coming to the Cavs, and half of his threes are from the corner. He's become, or has been forced to become, an extremely smart offensive player
03-06-2017 , 02:06 PM
His defense is a bit sloppy but once there's more consistency and fluidity with the team I'd imagine it improves a little. The other dwill otoh just sucks
03-06-2017 , 03:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw0586
Pulling this from the game thread because I think it could make for an interesting discussion:





I get what you guys are saying here, but I tend to think the opposite is true. Iverson and Rose could get away with playing bad defense because they had a good defense around them and their bad defense wasn't a hindrance.

With Isaiah, it's just not the case. It's not necessarily his fault that he doesn't have a better defense around him, but it's a reality. And, because of it, his bad defense hurts more and more negatively affects his value.
As usual, lol gameday threads.

Anyway, I'm not really sure what we're arguing. The original point seemed to be that a ton of players (someone said Jamal ****ing Crawford) could do what IT2 is doing, which seems ridiculous to me. How much better can we expect the Celtics to be? Like I said before, they're obviously deep with role players who are willing to play within the system and extremely well coached, but at the end of the day they're a top ~7 team in the league and their top 7 minutes getters aside from IT2 are Avery Bradley, Al Horford, Marcus Smart, Jae Crowder, Amir Johnson, Kelly Olynyk, and Terry Rozier.

I know Boston fans love to hype up their role players but that team has no business contending for a 1 seed. To me that says two things, Brad Stevens is a great coach getting the most out of his players, and IT2 has been terrific this year.
03-06-2017 , 03:54 PM
IT2 is the beneficiary of amazing fit is my point. If an offense wasn't centered around him, his defensive limitations make his value more dubious.

Your ceiling with him as your point guard is pretty defined, if they had more of a rim protecting 5 then it would just about be ideal - like what Iverson had with Dikembe and other defensive pieces like Eric Snow, Aaron McKie, George Lynch, Ty Hill, etc where he got to just gun a way.

That's not a Finals winner though. You're better off playing Smart and Bradley with an offensive 2 or 3 with size, like a Butler or George.

Last edited by DodgerIrish; 03-06-2017 at 04:03 PM. Reason: Your to You're
03-06-2017 , 03:57 PM
It's almost like having a giant free flowing tz thread actually jump starts good discussion and stimulates good conversations about basketball instead of arguing over the same 3 topics over and over.
03-06-2017 , 04:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Something about DWill2 that makes me cautiously optimistic about sustaining his good play:

He has only taken 4 shots between 3 feet and the three point line since coming to the Cavs, and half of his threes are from the corner. He's become, or has been forced to become, an extremely smart offensive player


Seems like pretty epic fit for them
They're so deep these roll players can all go max max effort on defense and switch em around constantly
03-06-2017 , 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by darO
It's almost like having a giant free flowing tz thread actually jump starts good discussion and stimulates good conversations about basketball instead of arguing over the same 3 topics over and over.
Killing TZ is what killed 2+2
03-06-2017 , 04:25 PM
The real Black Friday

      
m