Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
This trade bringing back BULLFAN
probably just an old Trollstoy account
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Insert Witty SN-
Floyd I will say I admire what you're trying to do itt.
no no no you don't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayTeeMe
this for sure
Lavine > Devin Booker right? Am i off here?
I got Lavine>Booker simply due to his potential as a creator off the bounce. I don't see a path for Booker to be anything but a great scorer. And even that, he's undersized and has poor shot selection (hence meh TS despite being a great shooter).
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheQuietAnarchist
as per usual, bad teams trading a 26-30 year star player get a mediocre haul. bulls didnt have much of a path towards being even a top 10 nba team, why not get some future assets and rebuild.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
It's a fallacy that you either need to keep Butler or make that trade. Could have done much better for him.
Ya this. Chicago was always gonna lose this trade, that's what happens when you trade stars. They didn't have to lose this bad though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadood228
Oh man I just realized I saved a post lambasting Utah going after Hill and predicting the exact result (getting to the playoffs only to be torched, losing Hill/Hayward). It's going to be a glorious bump if that happens.
Although I think it's sad that they did everything pretty much right in the process only to be going through this.
lol, you're ridiculous. Utah ran incredibly bad and were still a top ~5 team last year. They're supposed to pass that up to just be like a top 15 team? They have two top 30 players, they weren't going to bottom out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadood228
This is why you can't trust the eye test. I guess the post-ups and "cuts" they ran led to a lot of 1v1? I swear they would throw the ball to Andrew and Kat and let them go to work on most of their possessions every time I saw them.
Maybe watch the games without the Wolves-hating blinders.