I shouldn't talk, I might be the oldest reg here.
Looking back at some Plumlee/Nurk posts I find many LOLs and me being right about his contract.
lolCvig:
Quote:
I mean, I assume the plan is to extend Mason and give him $80M? He's gonna want that (maybe more?)
ill take the over on 4/60 for plum's next contract
Plumlee is about to turn 27 and you're about to give him at least $70M to be a backup who can't play defense or you're renting him to be below average instead of bad for a little while
Caldo:
Quote:
I think Plumlee gets at least 80M
Thay3r had some good ones but I didn't post because he was mostly right.
There were several others saying he'd get paid, while I offered bets that he wouldn't and predicted 4/32. Looks like he will get less for that and probably be worth a first at some point in that deal. So they traded #20 this year for Plumlee on a very reasonable deal that they can flip for similar value in the future... which is precisely what I predicted as others were talking about paying him 80M. Some GMs understand the market, while other ones (Lolshey) do not.
Having Nurk do a 180 after getting traded hurts though. The trade was obviously a major win for the Blazers, but considering he was a sunk cost with Denver I think it's working out well for them.