Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadood228
Except Nurkic broke his leg and has sucked save for a 20 game sample. Historically late-season runs do not have much impact on the next year.
Utah had 52 pythag wins last year. They lost Hill for Rubio, which is probably a net neutral given Rubio was a worse player but played more games. Hayward, otoh, played 73 games and had an AMAZING year, that loss is huge. What's more, Hayward and Hill were two of the only creators on that team, and a lot of Gobert's offensive surging came directly out of their PnRs... only now they have a PnR PG with no threat to pull up and it'll crowd Rudy's space because teams can just go under the screen. Mitchell is going to suck because all rookies do, and maybe Favors returns to where he was but he could also be done. I think 45-48 wins is about right.
Minny were a 38 win pythag team last year and added Butler/Gibson while losing Rubio for Teague. If we call the PG swap a wash for the same reason we'd call Rubio/Hill one, then their additions are just the two Thibs guys. I think those additions are easily worth 10 wins alone, and I think you can add another 5 for organic improvement of the young guys who are well below their peak years. I'm thinking 50-53 is about right for them, but the fit does not seem ideal.
OKC were a 43 win pythag team, acquired PG/PatPat and lost Yolo and Sabonis. A lot of their improvement depends on which PG13 we are going to see. Last year's George was barely a top 40 player but still miles better than Oladipo. My guess is he just didn't care last year, so I think it's safe to pencil him in as a top 20ish player. I think the addition of those two should lead to another 10-12 game improvement, which puts them at about 53-55 wins.
Denver were a 45 pythag team post Jokic starting, and basically traded Gallo for Millsap. Gallo was about a top 40 player and Millsap is closer to top 20, so the improvement isn't as great as some are making it out to me. I figure 2 more wins for Millsap>Gallo and another 5 wins for organic growth of their youngs, which is about 53. The fit is pretty good, but I could see things going bad for them if their young point guards can't make a leap...
I just can't bring myself to say Denver is going to win 50+ games even though the numbers all scream that out. I felt similarly last July when I said they'd win 40.
One thing I know is that Denver's opening line is going to be waaaay low and will per usual get bet up a few games, so get in while you can.
Agree with you on Portland's record w/ Nurk not meaning too much.
Last 20 games of the season is probably the least valuable 20 games to judge a team. 1/3rd the league is tanking, another 1/3rd is resting for the playoffs and Portland is trying to win every game to get the 8 seed.
I'm not feeling Utah at all. Favors/Gobert lineups make the court too small for a team that doesn't have the perimeter threats to create space for them. Rubio/Ingles/Hood are their 3 main perimeter options. JoeJ's iso style sucks for the regular season when teams are easily running their offense.
I just don't see how 1 of the worst offensive teams in the league is going to be able to make the playoffs in a loaded conference.
And Rubio/Favors/Hood are all players that fall into the "injury prone" category.