Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NBA Offseason Thread 2017 NBA Offseason Thread 2017

07-05-2017 , 07:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
why?
George really fills all the needs they had. 2nd scorer, elite defender, guy who can carry the offense when Russ is out which killed them last year.

And I think the George/Roberson/Adams core gives them a ton of upside defensively. Probably not going to be better than the Spurs during the regular season on D but their best 5 man unit should be better than the Spurs.

Losing Taj was a legit loss though. I'd like them a lot more if Taj stayed and they got rid of Kanter who is useless vs Hou/GS.
07-05-2017 , 07:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by guivre1408
So basically whenever a GM give a max contract he is terrible because he didn't listened to the market and when he use correctly the RFA status he's bad because he hurts the player's pussy ?

Gordon had a terrible year before signing his contract he was far from a lock to justify that money. It was good understanding of NBA FA rules by the gm

The ****ing revisionim level is over 9000 itt. Gordon dodnt deserve a 5 year max he developed into a player worth of it
The cap was going up a ton though. Even if Hayward doesn't get much better, locking him up in the 16-17m range for another 2 years in a cap of 100M is probably the right move. Especially when you consider Utah's lack of ability to sign FA's.

Yeah it would've taken some foresight and savvy, but that's what GMing is.

If you think he is worth paying 16m a year when the cap is 63-68m then you should really think he is worth that when the cap is 100m. Joe Ingles is getting 13m in this market, Hayward would've had to flame pretty bad to not be worth the 2014 max in 2017-2018.

Last edited by Onlydo2days; 07-05-2017 at 07:37 AM.
07-05-2017 , 07:40 AM
The cap going up to 100m is an information that filtered the season after hayward signed and Hayward being a max player is only true since this season

Thats why it was much easier to give Klay and Draymond 5 years max
07-05-2017 , 07:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onlydo2days
Making Hayward sign the offer sheet with Charlotte rather than just giving him a 5yr deal was a massive screw up.
That's why I said *almost*.

Compared to teams like the Magic, Pacers, Kings etc etc Utah is an extremely well org but one misstep a few years ago and now what can they do...
07-05-2017 , 07:45 AM
It was known it was going to be in the 80-90 range atleast though.

Wasn't fully known it would be 100 but it was something teams were planning for.
07-05-2017 , 08:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMVP
That's why I said *almost*.

Compared to teams like the Magic, Pacers, Kings etc etc Utah is an extremely well org but one misstep a few years ago and now what can they do...
Because giving a max contract straight after rookie contract, locks your player for the next 10 years .... OKC did correctly and still lost Durant

Utah are the victims of superteam full of betas All Stars, not the victims of a bad contract management 3 years ago
07-05-2017 , 08:09 AM
Utah isn't really a victim. They brought it on themselves moving an NBA team to Utah.
07-05-2017 , 08:19 AM
This is also correct, but I don't get the hate towards Utah. Is it only because mormons and full white state ?

Because if we talk about quality of life the following ranking seems accurate to me

City with Sun and beach > NY > City next to the Mountain >>>>>> all those awful town in the middle of nowhere like Atlanta, Houston, San Antonio, Milwaulkee .......
07-05-2017 , 08:24 AM
You gotta put it in the context of where would a 20 something NBA player would want to be. Utah is behind places like Hou/ATL/etc for that ranking.

We're not talking where to raise a family. We're talking where to find hookups on the gram at 3AM. Utah too wholesome.

Last edited by Onlydo2days; 07-05-2017 at 08:32 AM.
07-05-2017 , 08:24 AM
Never been to Utah it's probably decent enough for you or me, but for NBA stars probably not great.
07-05-2017 , 08:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadood228
Such a fun team. How they managed to have a top 5 offense in spite of no shooters is mind-boggling. He tore his ACL the next game and things went south quick



Gallo is one of the OG unicorns in the league. Slow as **** and not a good finisher, yet has amazing efficiency because he gets fouled so much. You'd think he was a terrible defender give his quicks, but he's always ranked pretty decent and is almost always in the best lineups overall.

Can't wait to hear some "BINGO"s from Lawler.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinarocket
He is a terrible defender
And thus we can conclude Gallo = Kevin Martin.
07-05-2017 , 09:37 AM
Knicks interested in Waiters. Of course they are.
07-05-2017 , 09:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
Never been to Utah it's probably decent enough for you or me, but for NBA stars probably not great.
its beautiful but the alcohol laws are completely absurd
07-05-2017 , 10:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onlydo2days
GS
OKC
Hou
SA
Minn
Den
NO
Port
Memph
LAC
Utah

That is the order, not really debatable. Hou/SA probably win more games than OKC but I like OKC as a playoff team better.

LAC looks OK on paper but it just feels like a team that was thrown together as a way to salvage after losing CP3. DJA/Bev/L Will are all FA's to be and wouldn't be surprised if they dealt them once the season went bad. Gallo/Griffin are both injury prone.

Utah is just going to be really bad offensively, maybe Gobert's D+nice homecourt carries them to a .500 season but West looks too loaded for that. Who is leading this team in scoring? Favors? Hood?

I am probably higher on NO than most. Staggering Brow/Cousins should mean they never have worse than a .500 level lineup on the court at all times, in theory.

I think Memph is on the decline as well unless Parsons has some miraculous resurgence but that isn't a very hot take. (Wonder if they re-sign Allen)
You forgot thread fav George Hill's KANGZ!
07-05-2017 , 10:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
Knicks interested in Waiters. Of course they are.
Hope he doesn't expect his meeting with James Dolan to be anything like his meeting with Pat Riley
07-05-2017 , 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
Just lol at thinkining patrick freakin patterson moves the needle
Thought the same. Read closely for trolling, and found none. Just wrongness.
07-05-2017 , 10:24 AM
I think PatPat >>> not having a PF isn't that hot of a take.

But agree this isn't a gigantic coup or anything.
07-05-2017 , 10:35 AM
I mean ppl were saying that okc could now compete with gsw.
07-05-2017 , 10:39 AM
guivre1408 you're talking about revisionist history while trying to revise history. Every team knew the cap was about to spike, hell it's all we talked about during the year where Lebron went back home, which happens to be the same year Gordon Hayward was extended. **** there are articles you can google if you don't believe me.

You're right that the market probably has to do with most of it, but they could have avoided this by locking him up for at least a year more. Hell all he was asking for as an extension the year prior, after 3 straight years of improvement, was 4/51 and Utah didn't budge at 4/48. They lost a year over $1million that they didn't want to pay annually, and they ended up paying almost four more after a down season. Everyone knew he was getting the max /year extension because of the cap spike.

It was botched, there isn't any way around it. What ended up happening the next three years was a slew of win-now moves in order to prepare for the day GH hit free agency--something that could have been avoided if they'd just had the foresight or ... you know.. NOT be haggling over 1M when your team is in Utah?
07-05-2017 , 10:48 AM
lol haralabob as often
07-05-2017 , 10:57 AM
Yeah I mean come on let's pump the brakes here on OKC. They were a 43 win pythag team last year, trading Dipo/Sabonis/Taj for George/PatPat is nice for them, but how many wins does that actually add? 7 wins seems about right. Factor in the fact that they were extremely healthy last year in as well.

I think 50 is an expected outcome for them.
07-05-2017 , 10:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
Just lol at thinkining patrick freakin patterson moves the needle
given their cap situation and what other free agent could do something similar, it's a huge signing. maybe it doesnt move the needle in your eyes, but it upgrades their roster a lot compared to whatever else was available on the market.

http://www.spotrac.com/nba/free-agents/

not exactly a treasure trove at power forward.

if they can't afford patpat, idk where else they go. george has been long adamant about not wanting to play the 4. i'm not even sure they could afford james johnson. they probably have to pray that jerami grant makes a huge leap. or they roll westbrook/abrines/roberson/george/adams and pray george doesnt ***** about it.

idk how you define competing vs giving them a sweat, but i like this roster's chances more than cavs. easy to just say lol westbrook but if you had to build a roster that could guard the GSW monster under the current cap, this is a pretty good attempt.

westbrook guards curry, PG guards durant, roberson guards klay, patpat guards draymond, adams guards iguodala.
07-05-2017 , 11:13 AM
These types of charts were contentious when they've been posted before, but this at least means something



The guy did note that most teams will decrease as they fill out the ends of their benches
07-05-2017 , 11:21 AM
So Memphis rumors is they are letting Green walk due to going in a different direction, now Marc gasol rumors appearing. Wonder if they are gonna blow it up?

Moving Parsons to Portland for Crabbe should be relatively easy to save Portland some cash but then there's conleys massive deal that'll be hard to move/swallow.

Memphis destined for mediocrity at best as it is this year.
07-05-2017 , 11:23 AM
Conley's deal wouldn't be hard to move at all, he is 1 of the best PG's in the NBA.

Maybe Gasol for Adams and future picks?

Seems like it would be a good gamble by Memph that OKC bottoms out in a few years.

Last edited by Onlydo2days; 07-05-2017 at 11:31 AM.

      
m