watched an interview with deaaron fox, he's gonna kill the interviews i think - comes across like a smart motivated guy. not making a value judgement yet, but based on his package + presentation i'd be unsurprised to see him rise to 3 over jackson
jackson seems like a smart dude too but as i perceive it, his weakness as a shooter is considered more glaring than fox's atm, which is interesting given that andrew johnson posted his 3pt shooting predictions for this yrs class (
link), and jackson/fox have seemingly little separating them as 3pt shooters by the numbers:
now those those projections are based on simple formulas. for example they don't include midrange stats as an input, i'm not sure if that's because it doesn't help (seems unlikely?) or that he just cbf including it. and you can make your own subjective adjustments to the projections above, like taking into account the fact that lonzo shoots like a stroke victim for example