Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
Markkanen and Porzingis together is kind of weird.
They would be great together. Elite spacing and Porzingis protects rim, Markkanen is going to be best off as PF defensively anyway. Throw a solid lead guard into the mix and you have a nice offensive upside.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heroball
Worried about Monk's quicks on O and especially D.
I'm worried about Monk in general. His 2P% has cratered 2nd half of the season which is esp bad considering how transition heavy he is and how serious his other weaknesses are. I was a buyer of his stock, but now I'm in limbo. Probably going to end up 7 or 8 on my final board.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heroball
Man, the signal/noise ratio on basketball twitter is despondent.
It's essentially Dean/X. It's Party c.2000.
thanks!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clayton
thought experiment to pass the time:
which teams do you think should take lonzo first and which teams do you think should take fultz first
i'm pro-lonzo so i think most teams should take him if they bink the lottery, but i think bulls and pelicans may be better off with fultz tbh
Everybody should pretty much take whoever is better.
If you want to argue fit for fun though, I would say whatever teams need passing should take Lonzo and whatever teams need scoring should take Fultz. I am curious why you think Pels may be better with Fultz, bc w/ Boogie + Brow I'd say they need a star passing PG more than anything.