Sure, it doesn't precisely estimate the passing value but I don't see how I can go that deep into the numbers since there is no way to isolate the value of passing w/o SportsVU technology.
I just know that there is no way in hell that the team offenses are THAT far apart w/o a substantial gap in passing. It does not pass the smell test based on all of my intuition from NCAA watching + gambling. No way are Holiday/Alford/Hamilton/Welsh significantly better than Henderson/Dorn/Rowan/Abu.
So this leaves a lot of fuzziness and uncertainty, but that's the nature of the draft and I acknowledged it in my conclusion on that section where I said he could become a good passer. It doesn't prove that he definitively sucks, but it should inspire enough pessimism to make him feel shaky as a top top pick in tandem w/ other flaws. Even if he is a bit better at passing than I am giving credit for, my bottom line argument still holds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eltbus
As far as content goes this has to be one of the better threads in SE
Keep it up dean
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heroball
Very logically/structurally sound and flows naturally. More insightful than Lowe imo.
Perhaps Tony Parker is an unspoken comp?
Thanks guys!
DSJ could be similar to Parker value-wise w/ some stylistic parallels as well.