Quote:
Originally Posted by miamicheats
porter has mostly been terrible with almost no flashes on being good
bennett started out very very very awful but showed flashes of being a capable-contributing nba player
otto porter has a 6.5 PER in 315 mins
anthony bennett has a 6.7 PER in 645 mins
i don't think it's fair to say that bennett has demonstrated any level of superiority to porter. they have both been awful. maybe porter would have looked better in his next 330 mins after having some baseline of experience to catch up to speed. maybe he'd look better if he hadn't dealt with injuries.
i take porter > bennett bc i think porter was a better prospect on draft night and neither has shown any promise that the other hasn't in their rookie seasons.