Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Stevenson
it's tbach again. just scanned through this thread and have some more thoughts:
1. jesus, posey is not as good as josh smith. but who would i rather have? posey AINEC. posey isn't good offensively, but j-smoove hurts your team offensively. like really bad. posey's maybe a slight negative, but in a league with this much depth and with so many guys who can score and not turn the ball over like j-smoove does, i don't like him.
2. kidcolin, i probably disagree with 80% of your posts too.
3. i don't think clark has ever answered a question i have asked him. it's not like he ignores them, he just answers them in a way that either is (a) incomprehensible (IE doesnt make sense gramatically to the point where it's illegible) or (b) answers the question in a way that doesn't make sense.
most recent example was (paraphrased):
tbach: "Clark, what player picked after Posey would fit better on my team?"
clark: "I think lots of players are better than Posey"
great posting.
4. the amount that posey is underrated is sickening. i'm going to risk sounding like mark jackson, but posey does soooo many little things. and yes, he's up there as one of the best perimeter defenders in the nba today.
I agree with you that Clark often starts arguments then just stops responding.
I still disagree on Posey, and I think you guys continue to overrate today's role players and underrate role players of yesteryear. Not to pick on you EPip because I'm sure that there are others, but you've mentioned that you've never even heard of some of the role players from the 80s that have been selected. Do you not see how you most likely, therefore, overrate today's role players and underrate older ones?
I don't mind Posey, and its not a horrific pick at all imo. But it was a reach.