has been a consistent 20/8 guy most of his career, right around 20 PER, except the last two years with New York when the team was just grotesquely dysfunctional (mostly not his fault). He even plays good defense when he wants to.
Everytime I target a player, he ends up going within two picks. I was going to pick Mullin at 69, give me a few to come up with someone else and I'll put my pick up.
I deleted it because I saw seadood came through with it. My writeup was basically copy/pasted from wiki. I don't think it matters too much though, sounds like people hate it enough that saying "Led the league in blocks in 2003" isn't going to change anyone's mind.
Okay so now that some of you on your high horses have done your "LOLOLOL" routine, why don't you explain in more detail your disdain for the pick so much, and actually make a coherent argument against the points I made in the writeup.
I deleted it because I saw seadood came through with it. My writeup was basically copy/pasted from wiki. I don't think it matters too much though, sounds like people hate it enough that saying "Led the league in blocks in 2003" isn't going to change anyone's mind.
It's probably good to get one up there anyway.
I think JO represents solid value at this point. There aren't many defensive stalwart big men available that have offensive capabilities, and he's one of them.