Quote:
Originally Posted by Assani Fisher
I think you misunderstood me. I wasn't saying that its a bad thing that he played more minutes. I was saying that his numbers are overinflated, though, due to him having played more minutes than the others. Look at his per 36 minutes as proof of this.
I'm not sure what you mean by the "pound for pound" argument. Basically the argument that I'm making is that Wilt dominated because he was so much larger than the competition. If he were in this draft, he would no longer be larger than the competition.
Again you keep listing bulk categories. I don't dispute that he put up sick bulk stats due to the facts that he A. Was way larger than the competition, B. Played a ridiculous number of minutes, and C. Was the first, second, and third option on his team. However, that doesn't make him better than the other 4 just becuase he put up great bulk stats.
I think we're on different wavelengths here, comparing apples to oranges. I agree with everything you said, including the fact that he would likely suffer more than the others in this exercise (although Russell sees the same effect, competing against much larger and better competition).
However, in the post that you quoted (that started this whole thing), my sole point that his statistical dominance over his era hasn't been duplicated. I'm trying not to open the can of worms of who was a better player, or who would do better in our magical league.
Just that his stats while he played were bat**** insane and nobody will ever come close.