Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarkNasty
Couple of things on Mookie before I head out:
I knew people would focus on his TS% - it's become the focus of many people in the second half of this thread. However, that's ignoring all of the other things he does well - which are plenty as evidenced by a consistently good PER for a guy who is so good at defense. This isn't Ben Wallace on the offensive end. It's also a great example of how young players who haven't played past 25 get overrated in this format. Mookies peak from 25-29 or so his TS% was a more than respectible 53% for a defensive stopper/pass first PG. But things get weighed down over the course of a career, in this case somewhat due to two early seasons that don't even count for this.
In addition, he really helped carry a team without any true inside presense for years. Mutombo and one other undrafted mediocre post presence for a few years was the closest thing they had to a post scorer. This not only hurts his shooting, but it also depressed his assist totals since it was a team of inefficient jump shooters/slashers. That is rectified in a huge way on my team.
In this format, Mark Aguirre (who I think was a good pick) would've gone like top 20 overall if we had done this after his 24yo season. Tons of other players both drafted and undrafted also would have had a similar escalation of value. Looking at career stats that include a decline phase (even an effective decline phase) for long lived players like Blaylock doesn't really give an apples to apples.
The general thought process here is "let's look at career averages for the retired guys, but let's extrapolate like 8 more years of current production (or better) for the young guys. That's imo a suboptimal way to evaluate things.
Anyways, I'd rather have Blaylock than, for example, Baron Davis who is inefficient shooting while taking far more shots, and isn't anywhere near the defender that Mookie is. There were like 3 other good PG options available, but none were close to as good on the ball as Mookie, which I think is important given the number of quality PGs that my team will be facing in this league. The fewer breakdowns on the point, the tougher my interior guys are. I understand why people dislike the pick, I just respectfully disagree and think he's better than the PGs who are certain to go in the next half-round or so of picks.
And if we had drafted Mookie after his age 24 season, he would still be looked at as a ridiculously inefficient player. His TS% in his 3 seasons up to age 24: 41.6, 45.5, and 46.5.
Also, as I said above, I think PG defense from a player whose height only lets him guard the other team's PG is not nearly as valuable as defense from any other position. I say this because many PGs aren't dominant scorers anyway, and several of them who are(Billups, GP, Kidd, etc.) will be able to take Mookie to the post, as Mookie is only 6 ft tall and 180 lbs and we know that they exaggerate those numbers too(fwiw I am no taller than 5ft 9.5in and they listed me at 6ft in college).