Quote:
Originally Posted by BobboFitos
i've already said this once, but i need to show MEBenhoe some love here: He's absolutely rigt.
reasons to the contrary:
durability: aguirre >> kiki
defense: aguirre was bad, kiki was attrocious
non scoring offense: aguirre was average, kiki below average (aguirre averaged more REB/AST/STL with less TO)
wild card: aguirre struggled offensively (drops in TS%, EFG, Usg%, PPG) after being shipped to the pistons for 4 years (2nd to last in pace for 2 years, last in pace for 2 years)
more regarding pace:
Kiki's teams during his first 8 years (prime): 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st (all with DEN), 7th, 3rd, 2nd, 3rd (all with POR)
Aguirre's teams during his first 7.5 years (prime): 21st, 14th, 18th, 23rd, 12th, 14th, 20th, 24th (all with DAL)
my conclusion:
Kiki was likely a better scorer than Aguirre; Aguirre was a marginally worse scorer, but better in every other regard. Enough to tip the scales his way, IMO.