Quote:
Originally Posted by Onlydo2days
another way of saying it is i feel like strickland should've been favored and if they fought again i'd favor him, albeit not by much......
If Strickland opens as favorite again, I buy DDP again. Feels like there are a couple obvious adjustments on his side not so much for Strickland. IOW, it's way easier to make a plan for what to do when you get a takedown than for what to do to not get taken down. Outside of "don't box from an upright stance" which is basically all Strickland is doing. I think team DDP was surprised that he was able to take him down so easily.
Quote:
Granted i doubt he is getting a title rematch anytime soon given the headaches he probably causes the UFC
Based on Dana's stupid comments post fight UFC was rooting hard for Strickland.
Quote:
Originally Posted by g-bebe
if Strickland could have scored a knockdown or a takedown I think it would have been enough to win.
I doubt a takedown would have changed anything outside of round 2 maybe. Knockdown would have changed rounds 2 and 3.
Problem is that I've never seen a Strickland takedown and he didn't even wobble DDP with any of his strikes. It's pretty difficult to knockdown someone with a jab unless you have a lot of power. Which Strickland doesn't.
Fun fact: that was Strickland's third (!) split decision in less than 2 years. All three times the dissenting judge was Sal D'Amato. First fight was vs. Joker that every sane person had 50-45 or 49-46 Strickland. D'Amato had it 49-46 Hermansson. After that he had it 49-46 Strickland vs Cannonier while both other judges had it 49-46 Cannonier. That fight was super difficult to score though.
Last night he scored round 3 for Strickland.
Last edited by madlex; 01-21-2024 at 01:03 PM.