Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubnjoy000
Madlex, thoughts on Strickland vs Dricus du Plessis, line is 1.68x - 2.18x respectively??? I am leaning on wagering on the latter, but solely based on a (non-analytical) gut feeling...
Unless I'm doing something wrong, converting those odds it looks like -147 Strickland and +114 du Plessis? That would be a pretty big vig. But maybe I'm off there. Draftkings has Strickand -135 and du Plessis at +114 right now. I bought du Plessis early on at +135.
Less than a year ago, Strickland was an underdog against Nassourdine Imamov. Granted on short notice only 4 weeks after the Cannonier loss and at 205 (Imamov is a natural MW too though). Before that he lost to Alex Pereira. Outside Adensaya there's not a single big name win on his record. I think he would be an underdog to Adensaya, Cannonier, Whitaker, Khamzat and maybe closer to pick-em against Vettori and Costa?
Unfortunately I have no idea how good DDP is. All I know is he has an awkward style combined with an iron chin. UFC did a very good job with bringing him up including two big names (Till, Brunson) past their prime before the Whittaker fight. So maybe he is the real deal or maybe he got lucky and Whittaker had a bad day. Biggest concern I have is that Strickland is a terrific defensive boxer with very good cardio. That's basically the only thing he does well. At least as long as he's no willing to grapple where he apparently just got bis BJJ black belt (and made a stupid video about it). Nobody knows about DDP's cardio but if he's as big as he was for the Whittaker fight I have a hard time seeing things going well for him if there's round 4 or 5.