Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19

02-20-2019 , 09:34 AM
In 1982 a kicker won the NFL MVP.

They were all dumb back then.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-20-2019 , 10:11 AM
Remember back then there was a game or two a week on TV and they got all their info from the boxscores in the newspapers. Most people probably didn't have ESPN yet either.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-20-2019 , 10:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgerIrish
In 1982 a kicker won the NFL MVP.

They were all dumb back then.


They never handed out physical trophies that year. Lol
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-20-2019 , 10:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
Was Willie Hernandez a closer? I noticed he won the MVP in 1984, which I think is interesting. His stats don’t really seem like out of this world that he deserved it, but also interesting that voters back then would vote a reliever the MVP of the league. Maybe I’m missing something.

Yes he was. Sparky Anderson didn’t use his bullpen the way a more recent manager would. Roles were less defined.

Hernandez had a terrific season but his win was definitely a function of the team’s great year.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-20-2019 , 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SABR42
Pitchers being good hitters is a sign of weaker competition. In high school the star pitcher of a team is often the best player and bats clean-up. Higher quality competition leads to more specialization.
I didn't look up the #s but 1965 Dodgers must be the worst hitting team to win a WS post WW2. Drysdale would frequently pinch hit that year, but I don't recall him ever playing any defensive position other than P. Certainly not Otani scale but noteworthy nonetheless.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 12:45 AM
If teams are smart players opting out are good for them

If the player sucks you are stuck with him anyway so the opt out doesnt matter


If he's good and opts out he's doing you a favor
He's gonna opt out and often suck bc he's old and you got his good years at a good price without getting stuck with the bad years

If the yankees let cc and Arod walk when they opted out it would have been great for them



On Don Newcombe-
After he retired from MLB he played for one year in Japan as a first basemen/outfielder
In 279 abs he hit 12 homers with a .789 ops
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 01:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borg23
If teams are smart players opting out are good for them

If the player sucks you are stuck with him anyway so the opt out doesnt matter


If he's good and opts out he's doing you a favor
He's gonna opt out and often suck bc he's old and you got his good years at a good price without getting stuck with the bad years

If the yankees let cc and Arod walk when they opted out it would have been great for them



On Don Newcombe-
After he retired from MLB he played for one year in Japan as a first basemen/outfielder
In 279 abs he hit 12 homers with a .789 ops
If someone is going to opt out that implies the current contract has value and could be traded if wanted. The opt out is only a benefit for the player. AFAIK we have not yet seen a player opt out because he was unhappy and wanted to go somewhere new.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 01:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borg23
If teams are smart players opting out are good for them

If the player sucks you are stuck with him anyway so the opt out doesnt matter

If he's good and opts out he's doing you a favor
He's gonna opt out and often suck bc he's old and you got his good years at a good price without getting stuck with the bad years

If the yankees let cc and Arod walk when they opted out it would have been great for them
The ARod example disproves your claim. While the Yankees would have been better off letter ARod walk when he opted out, the best outcome for them would have been for him not to opt out. Pretty sure getting a 32 year-old ARod for 3 years at $27 million a year would have been a great deal for the Yankees. Even with his decline, he averaged 5 WAR per season for the three seasons he opted out of.

Basically, not opting out >>> opt-out and letting him walk >>>>>>>> opt-out and resigning him.

Another example of players opting out not being good for the team is JD Drew. Pretty sure LA would have been happy to keep him for the $33 million for 3 years that he opted out of. Pretty sure that $11 million a year for a 3 WAR player is a great deal.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 01:20 AM
The idea that it's good for a team when a player opts out from their contract BecauseHeIsWorthMoreThanThat is beyond ridiculous why would anyone waste their time even reading an argument for it
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 02:25 AM
I can see the point, even if it's a bit skewed. On a 10 year contract, the front end should be surplus value, the middle should be approximately a wash when compared to the money and the back half should be decline phase where you're paying more for wins as a result of getting discounted wins early on.

Assuming an even distribution of salary across the contract, Manny opting out of 5/$150MM wouldn't be the end of the world for the Padres as it would mean they got good production in the first five years, and now at worst gives them option for re-allocation for the money that they almost surely would be paying during a decline.

Years 6-10 projects 10.4 WAR by ZiPS. If you ask the Padres if they'd be satisfied with 5 years and 24.1WAR or more for $150MM and then have Machado opt out and sign elsewhere, that's gotta be a resounding yes, right? Right, because they'd have gotten ~$200MM worth of value and only paid for ~$150MM. But I highly doubt he opts out at that aging curve unless the deal is front-loaded or the market rate on 1 win goes way up.

We all know that he's not opting out if he wouldn't otherwise get 5/150 or more on the open market, so it's kind of a silly point anyhow. The opt-out is yet to favor a team in any way, afaik, and that's the design of it. Of course you don't want him to opt out if he's good, and of course you want him to opt out if he's bad, but there's no scenario where the player is going to do what you (that is, as a front office) want him to do with an opt-out.

https://twitter.com/DSzymborski/stat...28417641664514
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 03:09 AM
He's projected to be a negative defensively?
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 03:36 AM
dwar is currently an awful stat.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 04:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by prizminferno
10/300

LOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornboy
I think just sorting by cumulative negative WAR is a little misleading - Pablo Sandoval got $100mm for -2.4 WAR, but only over 300 games. Ryan Howard forced his way into less value total, but in 545 games. Had the Red Sox kept running him out there, Sandoval would have been a bigger negative than Howard, he just never got the opportunity.

Plus, there's some value to resigning a homegrown playoff hero like Howard. Sandoval was a mercenary, hated immediately, and everyone knew that contract was awful from the jump. I bet some people were at least ambivalent about Howard on the day of the signing.

Edited to add - $72mm for Rusney Castillo is pretty horrific too, but he still manages to have a career MLB WAR in the positive.
Great post . Props for remembering the 72 million dollar minor league outfielder. I was going to post RS. STILL BLOWS MY MIND
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 04:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimHalpert
Narratives are often goofy. Dude hits 297/538/905 in a 5.7 WAR season and we're here talking about LOAFING and NOT A TEAM LEADER

Dude can take naps between innings if he wants so long as he puts up a 5.7 WAR season
The dude will be sleeping on a pillow filled w hundreds for the next 10 years . I’ll take under 5.8 war this year for Nachado up to 2k will escrow.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 04:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrAdvantage
The dude will be sleeping on a pillow filled w hundreds for the next 10 years ..
What do you think the front office will be sleeping on for the rest of their lives?
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 04:48 AM
Worst
Sandoval
Davis
Howard
Rusney Castillo
Career: 7 HR, .262 BA, 35 RBI, OF, RedSox 2014-2016, b:R/t:R, born in Cuba 1987.
2019 Contract Status: Signed thru 2020, 7 yrs/$72.5M (14-20)
Position: Outfielder
Team: Boston Red Sox (majors, non-roster invite)

I don’t fault y’all for not knowing the Ruse
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 06:20 AM
I havent thought about him in awhile. Is he in camp competing for a 4th outfield spot or is he just a pariah?
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 07:38 AM
He's in the minors because if he was on the MLB roster he'd count against the luxury tax
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 08:29 AM
So if he were salaried like a typical 3rd year player he would be a viable ballplayer? Obv Im not suggesting he's better than their current outfield starters (holy ****, how on Earth are they not the Killer B's?!).
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 09:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrAdvantage
Worst
Sandoval
Davis
Howard
Rusney Castillo
Career: 7 HR, .262 BA, 35 RBI, OF, RedSox 2014-2016, b:R/t:R, born in Cuba 1987.
2019 Contract Status: Signed thru 2020, 7 yrs/$72.5M (14-20)
Position: Outfielder
Team: Boston Red Sox (majors, non-roster invite)

I don’t fault y’all for not knowing the Ruse


Is this the guy who got signed because of a YouTube video?


Also, I remember reading something about how because of the Roster Depreciation Allowance, teams aren’t actually in a bad spot because of bad contracts.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrAdvantage
Great post . Props for remembering the 72 million dollar minor league outfielder. I was going to post RS. STILL BLOWS MY MIND
Then Yasmany Tomas is in the conversation as well.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 10:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bighurt52235
He's projected to be a negative defensively?
That kind of caught me off guard too, but this was the only projection system that I saw that covered 10 years and was in the neat, tidy spreadsheet layout. Not sure if that accounts for him playing some SS or not.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 10:50 AM
I've said before (re: the NBA) that player options only help the player, never the team - unless the player misgauges their market.

But one thing unmentioned about opt outs that benefits the team: It works as an incentivizer.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 10:57 AM
yeah, thought that would be obvious. its just another piece of the negotiation. without the opt-out he would have wanted more per year
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote
02-21-2019 , 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bighurt52235
So if he were salaried like a typical 3rd year player he would be a viable ballplayer? Obv Im not suggesting he's better than their current outfield starters (holy ****, how on Earth are they not the Killer B's?!).
They gave him a couple shots, failed miserably. I see the Mariners eventually trading for him.
MLB Off-season Thread 2018-19 Quote

      
m