Quote:
Originally Posted by mutigers
I’ve never understood why people **** on the possibility that there are choke artists in sports. I would assume random variance more often that not but you see clear obvious examples of players getting tight in sports like tennis I don’t see why it’s so crazy to believe in a sport like baseball where it’s just a pitcher v a batter and almost nothing else that matters . The pressure is absurd. I think it doesn’t really apply in like any non qb football position but in baseball, shooting baskets, tennis, golf, combat sports I absolutely believe it.
I thought it was pretty much accepted that although "clutch" doesn't really exist, not performing as one normally does when under pressure (choking) is a reality for some athletes.
When I think of Tiger Woods in his prime, it wasn't so much that he was "clutch" in important situations, he just didn't seem to have a drop off, and thus looked clutch compared to some others who did not perform as well under pressure.
Of course in baseball it is really tough to prove "choking," as there is so much variance, you get such small sample sizes in the playoffs compared to the regular season, and hitters are facing better pitchers (and vice-versa).
I also think that there are some sports in which choking should be less common. I would think that sports where trying harder doesn't help (baseball, golf, basketball (shooting), etc) it would be more common to find choking. In physical/contact sports such as football, rugby, etc. I would not expect to see much drop off because you are probably running on adrenaline and instincts much of the time.. Might be different for QBs, kickers and deep cover defenders, but for other positions you would not think of a person just starting to play bad because of the pressure of the playoffs.