Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMVP
MJ at 21: 38-44 record, bounced in the first round.
Lebron at 21: 50-32 record, takes Larry Hughes and Sasha Pavolic to the finals.
Cheery picking is easy huh!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMVP
I thought Jordan was a WINNER, why did he have a losing record and get bounced in the first round?
It doesn't make any sense!
OK let's not cherry pick at all then.
Top 5 VORP (minutes adjusted BPM; so total productivity) seasons for each player, side by side.
12.0 / 11.6
11.8 / 10.9
10.1 / 10.1
9.8 / 9.8
8.9 / 9.5
The better numbers on the left are Michael Jordan. Except for their 5th best overall season. The worse numbers are on the right. My guess is if Jordan didn't miss nearly two full seasons in his absolute prime it would be more lopsided, so lucky LeBron.
Now of course, a player could play in a way or on a team that allows him to stat hog at the expense of wins (someone like Wilt Chamberlain). So let's look at team success as well -- LeBron 6 champsionships (and 6-0 in finals) and Jordan 3 rings (and 3-6) in finals. So LeBron dominates there. And since, even though he's behind in stats, he totally dominates in team success, we can safely say LeBron is GOAT.
Oh crap wait I got that backwards. Jordan has way way way better team success too? And he's the one that's 6-0 in finals while LeBron is 3-6? Indicating his superior individual productivity is better aligned with team success? **** it's clearly Jordan that's the GOAT then for any rational thinker. If you're going by emotion and favorite player though I can see how it could still be LeBron, and that's ok. Not everyone can look at this rationally and in terms of facts.
Good idea that we probably shouldn't be cherry picking stats and actually look at player peak productivity to decide these things. It's the only rational way to do it!