Quote:
Originally Posted by fidstar-poker
Michael Jordan in 1996 averaged 27/5/4 on eFG of 44%
LeBron James in 2013 averaged 28/8/4 on eFG of 65%
you're conflating lebron's 2014 finals loss with the times that players lose to teams with superior
talent, where their stats cant be criticized.
but the heat didnt have worse talent than the 2014 Spurs, so their record margin of defeat reflected the difference in
teamwork between the 2 teams
so lebron's stats were achieved while his team had the worst teamwork ever in a finals.. therefore, his stats can be criticized as "empty", and his style of play as self-serving
Quote:
Originally Posted by fidstar-poker
So MJ wins because he is on a superteam with a lot more talent than the Sonics, but that's cool.
mj didnt have a super team or more talent than the sonics
but their offense did have better teamwork, and mj was the biggest part of the offense
Quote:
Originally Posted by fidstar-poker
l
Looking at those numbers MJ was worse. So maybe horrifically bad is a better term.
To put the 2014 Finals in perspective, Jordan's Bulls were closer to the 86' Celtics in ortg and ppg than Lebron's Heat were to the Spurs.. That's how HORRIBLE Lebron's teamwork was
so whats your excuse for lebron being less competitive with a champion team, than jordan was with a 30 win team?