Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollstoy
If the bulls kept losing...
But they didn't because he was so good they had no choice but to play up to his level, which is what LeBron is lauded for but Jordan won with Bill wennington, Jud buechler, Stacy king, will Perdue as role players. Bron will never be as good as Jordan, it's as simple as that. He was never going to be, we can continue to make excuses but the farther this charade goes on the sillier it looks
I'm not trying to say LeBron is better than MJ but there is a lot of revisionist history/nostalgia surrounding Jordan's run from '91-98.
The edge in having a guy like that grew massively because of all the expansion that took place in the late 80s and early 90s. Then they added Pippen, who was by far the 3rd best player at worst in any series they played, and their edge on the other teams was just really strong. Having Pippen when the Knicks 2nd best player was like John Starks was a bigger advantage at the time than people remember. Knicks, Pacers, Suns, Sonics. I mean jeez, couldn't Hakeem saved his GOAT years for '93 or '96.
The 2nd run in particular, the league was watered down and they had Pippen/Rodman/Kukoc/Harper. That is by far the most dominant a team was going to be over its competition and I don't we see that type of gap between a team and the rest of the league for awhile.
There just weren't many well rounded teams then to challenge the Bulls. Closest they came to losing was Indiana in '98, their 2nd best offensive player was Rik Smits. Yeah shocker they couldn't close the deal.