Quote:
Originally Posted by fasterlearner
This is all stupid. These guys using stats they really don't understand. All sports
change and evolve.
Using stats would be the absolute worst in hockey. You can sit there and argue W gretzky was twice as good as mcdavid because he scored 92 goals and mcdavid has yet to reach 50. Gretzky must be so so so so so much better the stats say so.
You guys are ******ed. You don't know how to use your eyes. My above example is perfect. Comparing stats today to 30 years ago is complete insanity, most so in hockey.
In that case guys like bernie nichols are better than connor mcdavid. But he scored 65 goals one year more than connor he must be better.
Pippen was one of the greatest defensive players ever. You guys no nothing of basketball. Lets compare stats now of todays players in a much more offensive game to yester years. That makes sense.
Well hold on a bit .....
Are you saying gretzky wouldnÂ’t dominate today as well ?
Just to be clear, jagr who was as close as anyone to gretzky and Lemieux , was able to score 27 goals at 42 years old not long ago in the nhl !
42 years old .....
Obv taking one of his best season as a comparison is stupid but if you take the average , I doubt he wouldnÂ’t be as good .
42 goals /93 assist for gretzky per year is certainly possible in this nhl time .