Quote:
Was it always obvious that one of the bigs has to stretch the floor? I lack theoretical understanding of basketball so I don't know, but everyone takes it for granted these days and I suppose I'm not convinced. Could HGH+Pau+3 outside threats (like Kobe Nash and someone) work if the Lakers had a coach with a brain? Does modern NBA really have no space in the paint for two bigs?
i'd say there has never "really" been enough space for two bigs in the paint in an offense. i remember reading an article, that i can't find now unfortunately, about how much ralph sampson's offense suffered after the rockets drafted olajuwon. sampson was a post player, but olajuwon was the better one so sampson was pushed farther away from the hoop (check his rookie stats vs the next couple years b/f he got hurt). think sampson was also considered to have better skills away from the hoop which made the move even easier. pau has had this happen two times now-- first bynum (last year), then dwight. he's versatile enough that he can play farther away from the hoop and still be a good offensive player though*.
anyway i digress, this concept is not as new as screw is saying. teams have always known that the interior is cluttered and that offenses run more optimally with space. bigs shooting 3's is fairly new, although i can think of some guys like sheed or sam perkins off the top of my head, but a big who can shoot has always been a nice commodity. think about how often the scouting report for a big references the ability to step out nd hit a face up jumpshot. difference now is that the bigs are moving farther out, but again it's not like no one ever thought to get a big who can shoot
*btw this is why i'm always confused by laker fans complaining about pau turning into a jumpshooter. he was pretty much relegated to the role. skilled as he is he's not going to take guys off the dribble from 15 feet out. so if he's stuck out there, which is most of the time now, he's probably going to shoot jumpers
edit: actually found this
grantland article about sampson/hakeem. this is different than the one i recall reading in that this one says hakeem/sampson fit really well, whereas the other said sampson's skills weren't used optimally even though it was better for the team(sounds familiar doesn't it?). anyway, this article notes how sampson moved out of the post to accommodate olajuwon and also has this interesting quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack McCallum (NBA writer, Sports Illustrated)
The Twin Towers concept was really a big deal. The NBA was resistant to change. You went out there and you had a center and somebody else had to be a forward. That's the first time I remember someone doing something different.
i'm thinking of guys like pj brown whose offensive roles consisted of setting screens, rebounding, and hitting open jumpers. going further back someone like horace grant was a "spacer". rick smits. can't think of anymore b/c i am not old enough ldo. again you see guys actually on the perimeter now instead of the elbow area or down the baseline. however i'd describe it more as the evolution/logical progression of a longstanding offensive tenet, rather than a paradigm shift
Last edited by tarheeljks; 03-12-2013 at 04:05 PM.