Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163
View Poll Results: GOAT?
labron
181 30.37%
MJ (Michael or Maple)
318 53.36%
Therapist
8 1.34%
George Mikan
5 0.84%
Shaq Attaq
21 3.52%
Wilt the Stilt (100 pts yo)
13 2.18%
Timmy "Big Fundamentals" Duncan
20 3.36%
"Roger Murdock"
3 0.50%
Enchanted AIDS Wang (er, HIV+?)
9 1.51%
Larry Legend (+ HM to Bill Russell's laugh)
18 3.02%

04-18-2024 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Horror
I think MJ is the GOAT, but slandering Pippen in the process is bullshit.

Let me try to explain how the historical record proves Pippen was trash.

Pippen didn't play in the closeout Game 6 of the 89' ECF and Jordan just needed about 10 points from Pippen to win that game, or Game 7 the following year in 1990.

And when MJ finally started winning from 91-98', that's what he got from Pippen - about 10 points in many games or 15.7 on 40% in the 96' or 98' Finals.... 19 on 42% for his Finals career.

People are just results-oriented by thinking Pippen must have been good to win 6 titles but in reality he was just providing the 10 points that he didn't provide in 89' or 90'... or thereabouts.. Pippen averaged 16/7/5 on bad efficiency for his career, but 6 chips inflates him to all-time status.. Pippen literally never played above a Larry Nance or peak Igoudala caliber, but the winning spotlight inflates him to all-status.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:05 PM
ur ppg-oriented

this isn't baseball
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:08 PM
Jordan is a better Iverson, with a whole elite defensive team catered to his chucking.

That's why they won an amazing amount of games once he went away, they just slotted Scottie into the same role.

Scottie was a cross between Draymond and Grant Hill. An awesome player, to those that can actually understand basketball. A number five pick is a pretty elite prospect, obviously.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgerIrish
ur ppg-oriented

this isn't baseball

Everyone needs a 2nd scoring option

Without it, you're a 1-man team

Again, when Pippen missed Game 6 of the 89' ECF or Game 7 in 1990, Jordan only needed about 10 points from Pippen to win either game and make the Finals - that would be a 100% carry-job and when Jordan finally started winning, the 10 points is what Pippen provided in many critical games, or 16 on 40% in many big series or Finals.

So Pippen was never a juggernaut that provided big production but the winning spotlight and ring count inflates his garbage production to all-time status.

You say that PPG isn't important, but it's the biggest kind of help that everyone in history needed, except the GOAT... only the GOAT carried the most important category for more than 2 chips (6 chips)...

Role players rebound and pass - stars score.. However, Jordan led the Bulls in assists most runs and got more DPOY votes than Pippen every year, so the "sort by PPG" critique fails just based on that - Jordan played goat offense and defense simultaneously, while being the only elite playmaker on the team.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:14 PM
I mean, how great of a prospect do you have to be to be picked #5 out of Central Arkansas!

Somebody needs to give Krause his flowers on that one.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72off
shaq was amazing to watch. proof: lets watch him bully some college kids




and mj would average 70/30/20/10/5 today (at age 61)
Awesome for sure but a strange lack of team success for such utter dominance in the paint. Compared to the other super dominant college centers -- Alcindor, Walton, Russell, Olajuwon, Chamberlain, Ewing, Sampson, Gilmore, Hayes, who else?? -- his teams really struggled. Double digit losses every year and I think 2-3 in the NCAA Tourney.

He had some other serious talent on his teams. Maybe the 3-pt shot affecting the game as compared to all those other guys? Dale Brown effect? Same thing seemed to be happening in the pros until he got with Phil and Kobe. Some kind of Chamberlain or Nolan Ryan effect? He slipped major about age 30. Hmm. Wow only one MVP? Seems weird.

Well those highlights are impressive but something was missing. It seemed more like a Globetrotter show, somewhat comparable to Pistol Pete before him in that respect.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGramuel
Maybe in LA?
Kobe #2 is a very popular casual opinion, even before he died.

It's not just an LA thing.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgerIrish

Jordan is a better Iverson, with a whole elite defensive team catered to his chucking.


Lebron's ball-dominance and turnovers are more like Iverson than Jordan, who also shot 10 percentage points better than Iverson and had better efficiency per possession than Lebron - imagine Lebron using more possessions at higher efficiency - aka doing more - that was MJ.

And the Bulls had weaker defenses than the 91' Pistons, 91' Lakers, 92' Knicks, 92' Blazers and 93' Knicks - that's most of their ECF and Finals opponents.. The Bulls had zero rim protection in a big man league and the least athletic guards in the league, so the idea that Jordan had great defensive help is false - you have no clue what you're talking about and simply regurgitating Klutch propaganda

And Jordan lifted a ; borderline .500 team in 95' to 3-peat in his first full seasons back.. No one cared about playing the Bulls in 94' - they went from 3-peat to 2nd Round and then borderline lottery in 95'.. Complete garbage without MJ.. If MJ never came back, they would be lottery in 96' instead of goat team - pretty big difference

Last edited by fallguy; 04-18-2024 at 08:28 PM.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:23 PM
If you think LeBron's game is more like Iverson than Jordan's was then that alone is another huge indictment of your basketball acumen
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fallguy
the idea that Jordan had great defensive help is false
omg, k
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:36 PM
This is a pretty good post from RealGM on how Lebron would be a better offball player than MJ, even though he didn't get to play that way as much:

https://forums.realgm.com/boards/vie...292#p109473292

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyUniBroDavis
You don’t understand Xs and Os sadly

What makes Lebron better off ball is you can conceptually do a lot more with him if you lean into that, Jordan did end up doing more off ball throughout their careers in the roles and offenses they played in, but that’s not the same thing as who was better off ball.

First of all, generally speaking the type of empty side clear out cuts (I forgot the name ngl) to create get overhyped as some sort of massive brained play, as well as cuts to draw help defenders, alot of those are built in or dependent on how a team functions. We saw in 2021 and 2022 the Lakers were stupid stagnant in their post offense, in terms of cutting off of both stunts and baseline hep, whereas in 2023 and 2024 they’ve id when to cut and when to flash or set pin in flares (digging vs baseline help) and you see the post data for AD suddenly looks alot better. Of those guys brons certainly the best cutter off of stunts to the point they can’t really do it off of him or they have to stunt and rotate high and give up the cut to someone else instead

And 45 stampede cut + lift people overhype the crap out of thinking it’s the pinnacle of bball intelligence lol, it’s really just how the offense decides to align for those opportunities and we’ve seen it with brin

There REALLY isn’t a comparison in terms of what they could do though

First of all, lebron is a better shooter off ball, because he can shoot the three. Yes, era matters there and it’s unfair to Jordan but in an absolute sense yeah this isn’t a close comparison, brons abour a 37-42% three point shooter throughout 2010-2023, he takes a lot of pullup jumpers in pick and roll and hits them at a respectable rate (relative to average players) that brings down his averages (35% off the dribble would be about 40% off the shoot probably)

Lebrons catch and shoot three point data per Synergy:

2010: 34.7%
2011: 39.3%
2012 34.7%
2013 42.1%
2014 42.5%
2015: 42%
2016 36.0%
2017 40%
2018 41.4%
2019 35.0%
2020 40.6%
2021 37.6%
2022 37.1%
2023 31.8%
2024 45.9%

In any case spot up shooting is much more not being bad than being an outlier unless ur a crazy outlier which neither of them are, I agree it’s unfair to say jordan didn’t shoot well from three therefore he’s worse because of era but arguing the other way around because bron doesn’t shoot catch and shoot midrange jump shots off of screens which has been largely phased out is equally unfair and it’s also a less valuable skill period if ur talking about midrange shots

As for being a lob threat:

Jordan was around 6ft4-6ft5 barefoot and his vertical from what I recall was measured at 45 inches in some UNC paper off an unlimited run ip and 41 inches with the ball. If you’ve ever played basketball you know that it’s not 1 to 1 with vertical and height, ur never gonna see a guard be a roll man lob threat consistently

That’s not a lob threat in a way that functionally matters at all in the context I was describing, which was as a roller. Lebron barely qualifies being 6ft8.5 barefoot with a 40+ inch vert as well, and I’m taking about pre Lakers for sure (maybe even only up to Miami but not sure)

It’s mitigated a tad by the fact that lebron on the move with the ball is basically unstoppable, but that doesn’t mitigate it all that much in the context of why you want a lob threat in pick and roll vs aggressive coverages

There’s a much stronger argument that neither of them are in that context than Jordan being one as well. Jordan isn’t tall enough to be one, bron probably barely meets the mark but I get the argument he doesn’t in the context of what I said

The entirety of how he improved in 2023 outside of Lebron getting to be more physical rather than quick was them starting to get him the ball on the move more, in the playoffs he couldn’t do anything on ball at all

Offensive rebounding:

I mean neither are threats in the way that someone should consider an off ball player, (using raw rebounding % makes no sense when that number has changed lol). But regardless of a 0-1% change either way, lebron technically is a bigger threat just based on size since off ball offensive rebounding is probably more about in mismatch situations on certain switches (beyond that, offensive rebounding is just… offensive rebounding lol)


Quicker decision maker on the catch:
Being a quick decision maker off the catch isn’t equivalent to possessions resetting when they pass it out at times but this really isn’t comparable to the other advantages lol


Anyways, a 38 year old lebron currently averaging less touches a game than Brandon Ingram with less time of possession than Austin reaves, he’s averaging 26-8-7 on 67%TS and noticeably taking it easy till the fourth, and is a +17.4 on offense which ranks poorly overall because they can’t function without him (which is a bit from bad luck to be clear)

A 37 year old bron in the 18 game stretch where AD was hurt and we desperately were clinging to the playoffs, with no spacing, averages 80.6 touches a game (14th) , an average time of possession of 6.3 minutes (15th) , an average time of 4.66 seconds per touch (52nd). Those numbers aren’t quite as low as they were in Miami (2014 only) where people say off ball bron was somewhat of a thing but they’re close ish, especially considering who the team had around them and the raw volume of their offensice production. If I recall lebron was like a +17-18 on offense and we were top 5 in the games he played on that end

Wouldn’t call it off ball at first, the caveat is he was averaging 33.5/8/8 on great effeciency (62.5TS), so those rankings are insane considering the production

So what we have here is a VASTLY declined Lebron put his foot on the gas for 20 games and pretty consistently was a top 3 offensive player in a league with Jokic, Luka, Curry, in that stretch before injuries got him, and currently brons averaging a career high percentage inside the arc and his average career numbers despite sleepwalking untill the fourth quarter because he definately wants that clutch player of the year award unless 500k is on the line or it’s a marquee/revenge game matchup (anyone that doubts this has not seen the Lakers, lebron is currently leading the league in ppg in the fourth other than tyus Jones whose played 1 fourth quarter, averaging 32-8-8 per 36 on 70.8TS)


Now shooting off of screens is genuinely important, but not as much from the midrange nowadays


Jordan is good in the context of an elite normal player off ball whereas Lebron has much more unique value off ball which is the main thing here

Jordan doesnt open things up schematically for you to be more creative and diverse with what you can do for your offense or to make your actions more effective, he is an incredibly smart and skilled player off ball

Lebron, especially the younger versions of him that would be a lob threat that still shoot well off the catch, if you play into that absolutely does those things.

As cutters their values aren’t even remotely close, an issue with synergy tracking is some post ups are considered cuts and stampede cuts aren’t classified as cuts iirc, but not only is bron historically effecient off cuts for awhile now, but it’s one of those things where it’s a unique value vs other guys. With most players off cuts it’s cuz they’re so fast and smart with it but if you can wall up it’s fine, with bron it’s because he’s fast and huge so if you wall up he’ll go overpower you and he knows how to not foul in those situations, hes unstoppable on the move and it shows in those situations. This should be a non starter, lebrons shooting 80-90% on cuts throughout his career, his cutting has unique value because of the combination of size, finishing, speed, and playmaking. An argument for Jordan here is as much of a non starter as saying he’s better in transition

The synergy stat sheet that’s someone made for Jordan awhile back is a bit broke because turnovers weren’t accounted for, but iirc over 142 games jordan was at 68% inside the arc on cuts with a little more than one a game

That is both impressive and lower than any season bron has had since and including 2010, especially in recent years where brons relied on it and focused on it more he’s at hovering at around 80%, on a bit more volume as well per game (My mistake, one year they had a similar percentage where bron was at 67%, but bron had more volume)



As an off rolling big, its REALLY hard to name a guy that has basically all the skills you need vs every coverage, spot up shooting, short roll passing, punishing mismatches, lob threat. Throw in offensive rebounding there too but that’s not usually one I think of to beat coverages as much as a bonus but its valid. There are ways to mitigate lacking in some of those skills but that gets tied into the ball handler and coaching.

Lebron checks at least 3/4 boxes super comfortably, and as a lob threat he’s 6ft8.5 barefoot with a 40-45 inch vert, At least when he was younger, he’s a tad short for that but he’s an inch or two shorter than AD and dwight so he could still be one.

Jordan does not qualify as a lob threat in that situation and it doesn’t even make sense to care about him in that situation


A lot of Arguments for Jordan on here in the context of their off ball ability are focused on what occurred situationally in the situations they were in ans the systems they played in (which is valid), but the arguments that hes actually better just always end up being super vague and not actual descriptive which just sounds like waffling things out of thin air lol, throwing out super vague descriptions of what happens on the court m to make a point is barely step better than throwing out a narrative out there imo. In a concrete sense lebrons just so more of a potent tool off ball you can do more things with, feel that’s a given if you have schematic knowledge of the freedom a guy like bron gives you over a guy like Jordan

I see a better argument for Jordan on ball than off ball in terms of them as players, people don’t get how ridiculous younger versions of lebron would be as a rolling small ball big that’s still a huge lob threat, but obviously it goes without saying he’s more impactful on ball than off ball. There are less than 5 players in nba history that check all the boxes as an rolling big probably and he would be one of them. You don’t need to check all
The boxes but it gives you so much more versatility and reseliency against coverages, we saw the warriors pick and roll attack somewhat die this past postseason against a high drop since Dray isn’t a lob threat and switching hurt it at times too even at their best, Westbrook and AD had issues because neither of them could should and Westbrook wasn’t as fast as he used to be so things like north south ball screens and flipping the screen weren’t quite as dominant as they had been
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgerIrish
omg, k

The Bulls had no rim protection in a big man league and only the #7 defense during the 1st three-peat

They had worse defenses than every ECF and Finals opponent during the 1st three-peat except the Suns.

So the stats and facts are on my side and don't support what you're saying
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by candybar
This is a pretty good post from RealGM on how Lebron would be a better offball player than MJ, even though he didn't get to play that way as much:

https://forums.realgm.com/boards/vie...292#p109473292

^^^ didn't read, but that's like me making a long-ass argument that Jordan could've averaged 7 blocks if he wanted.

Lebron had a point guard hold-time and assisted rate (not an assist target) for his entire career.

He spent 21 years as the primary ball-handler and got coaches fired if they went against this

but the reality is that he was actually a great off-ball player?

lmao... Lebron can't shoot!!!.. His jumpshot isn't anywhere near MJ or Kobe and he lacks great hoops instinct to play off teammates.. LeMechanical.... LeNotSmooth.... LeUngraceful... LeBrick!!!..

He's too bulky and clumsy to run off screens or guard guys like Klay off screens - he literally cannot play or defend off-guards (SG's).

Last edited by fallguy; 04-18-2024 at 08:51 PM.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgerIrish
I mean, how great of a prospect do you have to be to be picked #5 out of Central Arkansas!

Somebody needs to give Krause his flowers on that one.

This shouldn't be considered "help"

CAREER FINALS

Jordan..... 34 ppg... 6.0 apg... 2.8 TO.. 48%.. goat clutch
Pippen..... 19 ppg... 5.9 apg... 3.3 TO.. 42%.. zero clutch (worst-ever)


CAREER PLAYOFFS WITH BULLS

Jordan..... 33 ppg... 5.7 apg... 3.1 TO.. 49%
Pippen..... 18 ppg... 5.3 apg... 2.9 TO.. 45%

Again, when Pippen missed Game 6 of the 89' ECF or Game 7 in 1900, Jordan only needed about 10 points from Pippen to win each game... And when Jordan started winning from 91-98', that's pretty much what Pippen gave him!!!.. Pedestrian production (see stats above).

There's never been a bigger statistical gap between 1st and 2nd option.

Every dynasty was an all-star team except Jordan's Bulls.

People are just results-oriented by inflating Pippen based on ring count instead of actual performance - he forced MJ to carry the team (see stats above) and achieve goat production rates (PER, BPM, VORP, WS, PPG).
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:57 PM
I think fallguy is the one who needs defensive "help".


His arguments stink!
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgerIrish
If you think LeBron's game is more like Iverson than Jordan's was then that alone is another huge indictment of your basketball acumen

Lebron is #1 all-time in turnovers and among the turnover leaders every year

That's Iverson-ball... Jordan was never a turnover machine - only Lebron and Iverson

In addition to turnovers, Lebron is a historic ball-dominator like Iverson that turns teammates into spot up shooters - he literally reduces their assists and increases their assisted rate/play-finishing.. Turning teammates into spot-up shooter kills young player development, fits and strategic capacity/coaching.. It's a horrible brand of ball that underachieves favored rosters (loses with preseason favorite, or fall to underdog).

^^ all that is Iverson and Lebron, not Jordan
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 09:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin
I think fallguy is the one who needs defensive "help".


His arguments stink!

You guys spout blatant Klutch Sports lies and propaganda

I debunk

Rinse repeat.. Anyone following this thread can see that and if you read my posts, you guys would see itvtoo and stop posting the same debunked lies and trash
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 09:40 PM
fallguy,


have you ever thought that Jordan.. doesn't need defending?
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin
I think fallguy is the one who needs defensive "help".


His arguments stink!

Lebron cannot dominate as the roll man like Karl because it required all-time mid-range touch and assisted jumpshooting (lebron's biggest weaknesses).

Specifically, the stats for Karl Malone show that 408 of 780 field goal attempts (61%) were jumpshots in 1998.

All were from mid-range and Malone had a 78% assisted rate.. Lebron's assisted rate has never been above 50% and it's usually point guard level (around 30% or less) for his entire career.

Again, Lebron has employed a point guard hold-time and assisted rate for his entire career (point guard skillset), so this idea that most of his field goals could be assisted mid-range jumpers (so he could dominate as the roll-man) is absurd.

You guys are just making stuff up at this point because the stats and historical record aren't on your side.

Lebron will always have mechanical stone hands and never feathery jumpshooting touch so any analysis of his capabilities should have this understanding as a baseline to guide the analysis... This way there won't be wildly absurd conclusions like Lebron being capable of shooting mostly assisted mid-range jumpers
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 11:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by All-inMcLovin
fallguy,


have you ever thought that Jordan.. doesn't need defending?

of course he does because everyone lies about his career to create this fake debate.. if they looked at the facts, they would see there's no comparison - one guy mostly loses with 2 star teammates while the other guy was unbeatable with 1

Last edited by fallguy; 04-18-2024 at 11:23 PM.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by candybar

Lebron would be a better offball player than MJ,

even though he didn't get to play that way as much:


The stats for Karl Malone show that 408 of 780 made field goals (61%) were jumpshots in 1998... All jumpers were from mid-range and Malone had a 78% assisted rate.. Lebron has never taken mostly jumpers, let alone mid-range, while his assisted rate has never been above 50% and is usually point guard level (around 30% or less).

Again, Lebron has employed a point guard hold-time and assisted rate for his entire career (point guard skillset), so this idea that most of his field goals could be assisted mid-range jumpers (so he could dominate as the roll-man) is absurd.

You guys are just making stuff up at this point because the stats and historical record aren't on your side.

Lebron will always have mechanical stone hands - he'll never have a feathery jumpshooting touch so any analysis of his capabilities should have this understanding as a baseline to guide the analysis... This way there won't be wildly absurd conclusions like Lebron can dominate by shooting mostly assisted mid-range jumpers (roll man like Malone) - the dumbest and most delusional thing I've ever heard.

Ultimately, Lebron cannot score 36k as the roll man, so Lebron is built like Karl except with a PG skillset instead of big man skillset... Regardless, it's still just karl malone and inferior to MJ.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 11:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fallguy
of course he does because everyone lies about his career.

Anyway, as the previous post showed, Lebron cannot score 36k as the roll man, so Lebron is built like Karl except with a PG skillset instead of big man skillset... Regardless, it's still just karl malone and inferior to MJ.
C'mon fallguy this isn't true. Not everyone. Stop it. Go outside, touch some grass. Enjoy nature. It's Spring.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-18-2024 , 11:43 PM
So what I'm hearing is that someone who's built like Karl Malone, except better in every way... better passer, better ball-handler, way faster and more athletic, and way higher basketball IQ... is just Karl Malone still.

New dumbest thing ever said.

Karl Malone was a great player. He had a great mid-range jumpshot that made him perfect for pick and pop, but for a guy who's 6'9" and built like a tank his vertical was embarassingly bad and he played mostly below the rim. Barkley, despite being much shorter played more above the rim than Malone did, and rebounded much better too. Oh and Barkley wasn't a pedo rapist like Malone either.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-19-2024 , 12:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SABR42
So what I'm hearing is that someone who's built like Karl Malone, except better in every way... better passer, better ball-handler, way faster and more athletic, and way higher basketball IQ... is just Karl Malone still.

New dumbest thing ever said.

Karl Malone was a great player. He had a great mid-range jumpshot that made him perfect for pick and pop, but for a guy who's 6'9" and built like a tank his vertical was embarassingly bad and he played mostly below the rim. Barkley, despite being much shorter played more above the rim than Malone did, and rebounded much better too. Oh and Barkley wasn't a pedo rapist like Malone either.

lebron, barkley, and malone are bulky, slow and unskilled compared to MJ.. Lebron makes basic plays look better because he's so big, while those plays are normal and pedestrian for guards like MJ or Kobe.. Lebron is stuck in beginner-ball and luka-ball, while MJ and Kobe advanced much further and learned to win without ball-domination.. it's funny that Lebron fans say that a guy who won 6 chips in the triangle is just another "iverson", when the "iverson" distinction should be reserved for the biggest ball-dominator and turnover machine in history (lebron).

btw, malone is better than lebron at big man skills, aka strength, rebounding, post dominance, turnover rate, 2-point jumpshooting, off-ball, chemistry and defense on big men - Lebron lacks the skill to fit with Stockton and most ball-handlers, while Malone possessed this skill (expert jumpshooting touch).

Most of Malone's shots were jumpers and assisted, while most of lebron's are layups and unassisted... Malone was also all-defense well into his 30's, while Lebron hasn't played good defense in 10 years.. btw, this idea that Lebron could just crash into the paint as the roll man in the 90's is false - the reason Malone had to take so many jumpers is because the paint was completely packed, so all good scorers were forced to shoot over defenses - the packed paints and lack of spacing is why today's ball-dominators would struggle back then (without teammates to space the floor for them).

So Lebron lacks the skill to score 36k as the roll man - he's built like Karl but has a point guard skillset instead of big man - regardless, it's still just Karl Malone and inferior to MJ.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote
04-19-2024 , 12:20 AM
I don't believe fallguy actually believes what he's posting now.
LeBron = GOAT Containment Thread: SABR42, LuckyLloyd, & borg23 Co-MVPs b/c of post #20163 Quote

      
m