Quote:
Originally Posted by iggymcfly
Yes, a team that won 4/5 games against elite competition should be well ahead of a team that won 1/3 games against same. This is not rocket science.
florida played 3 elite teams by my count 4 if u wanna count a&m although i contend they peaked in the 2nd half, florida state just sucks youve been overrating them all year and for some reason you cant let that go.
so they played lsu at home, sc at home, uga on neutral field, and a&m (before they peaked) on the road. home field in conference is pretty important. if sc got to play uf and lsu at home and uga at a neutral site they finish the season undefeated assuming lattimore doesnt get killed again.
anyway ur basically punishing georgia for making the seccg, since fla surely would have lost had they gotten there. but they didnt get there, bc they lost to the team you have ranked 9 spots below them on a neutral field lol. its totally hypocritical too, lsu went 2-2 vs 'elite teams', a&m went 1-2, and youre constantly lauding them.
i cant believe any1 would have fl>uga, georgia has a better D, a better QB, a better rushing attack. ffs they almost just beat ur #1 with their top 2 WRs injured.
edit: **** forgot ur a ga tech fan, yea this was a waste of time