Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread

12-31-2012 , 08:31 PM
Akers could have cost the 9ers the 1 seed. ****ing rams.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 08:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fanmail
still sucks that the vice grip cost the packers the bye, ugh
No it most definitely does not suck. the packers are still soooo far onto the + side of officiating variance/riggage it's not even funny.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 08:34 PM
Don't think Systolaids has done anything to get banned yet (though I don't read his posts). Plus keep him around in case the Falcons **** the bed in the playoffs.

O/U posts that look like this when that happens:

"1. Fa(i)lcons"

63.5
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 08:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Look at their allowed scoring numbers.

The last game was obviously not played at full tempo/full playbook.

They crushed NYG in that span of 4 games you're referring to.

Matt Ryan has put up career numbers this season. Atlanta is near the top of the league in turnover differential.

Their defensive yardage numbers have been better than the Packers who won the SB. 24th isn't that bad when you compare it to 32nd. Yardage totals wont keep a team from winning games. Points do, and the Falcons are excellent at stopping drives and limiting opposing offenses to field goals.

Theyre also the least penalized team in the league, and for the most part play clean and mistake free.
You have to be one of the dumbest posters I have ever come across. The Falcons are an above average team but that's it. I got a proposition for you. If the Falcons win the Super Bowl then NLSoldier and I will not post in SE for the rest of 2013. If the Falcons do not win the Super Bowl then you can't post in SE for 2013.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 08:35 PM
My homer playoff picks:
NFC

GB > Minnesota
Sea > Wash

9ers > GB
ATL > Sea (blah).........(could definitely see SeaChickens winning this, 9ers / Seattle III @ Candlestick would be hot--although the 9ers would need to show up).

9ers > Atl (this assumes Justin is decently healthy, if not GB > 9ers and GB to the SB)

AFC

Texans > Cin
Indy > Baltimore (even though Indy sucks, Baltimore is terrible right now)

NE > Texans
Den > Indy

Den > NE (this is a coin flip)

SB:

Can't pick...I would say 9ers > Den, but also Den > GB.

Non homer SB Odds from 1-12:

1. Den
2. SF
3. NE
4. GB
5. Sea
6. Atl
7. Texans
8. Washington
9. Baltimore
10. Cincy
11. Minnesota
12. Indy

I know I got Indy at 12, but I think they beat Baltimore. If Seattle had HFA, they would be my #1 or #2....but 3 road games is going to be tough.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 08:35 PM
good call im just gonna put him on ignore till the falcons lose

Last edited by NLSoldier; 12-31-2012 at 08:37 PM. Reason: it would be awesome if we could get like the majority of SE regs to put him on ignore till the falcons lose.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 08:40 PM
fwiw 5dimes has ATL -7.5 against WAS and MIN and -2.5 against SEA
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fanmail
still sucks that the vice grip cost the packers the bye, ugh
although this call was obv. BS - the Packers lost to the effing Colts, got stomped by the Giants, and coming into Week 17 were the #2 seed. they were the favorite to win @ Minn and couldn't.

I think it's time to stop blaming a bad call in week 3 for why the Packers didnt get the bye
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 08:49 PM
Yeah, obviously they controlled their own destiny last weekend, but it's still a joke.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 08:52 PM
Quote:
1st and 10 at MIN 21 C.Ponder pass deep middle to J.Wright to GB 14 for 65 yards (S.Shields).
All rights to complaints voided
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 08:52 PM
Jokes happen sometime in the NFL.

Roger Goodell is an aspiring comedian.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 08:59 PM
Dont get the problems with the Seattle hail mary. People obviously havent seen the other camera angle that clearly shows Golden Tate's Vise like grip on the ball.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A-Rod's Cousin
Pudge, you can post all the pictures of straw men you want but unless you are willing to discuss any stat other than yardspercarry (and ignore everything else) when evaluating players who line up at the runningback position then we are basically just going to have to agree:
[/IMG]

and leave it at that.
I know you are brain dead and stubborn and still basically have the same rhetorical comprehension as you did when you argued pitchers consistently pitched to the score. So since you have some trouble understanding what I wrote in previous posts, I will help you out. I am going to lay out my argument point by point, so that even someone who went to HS in Texas might understand it.

1. LDT and ADP are both excellent RBs. I am unsure who is better.
2. LDT is a much better receiver than Peterson
3. Number of games played in a dome is irrelevant in determining their quality
4. Number of touchdowns is largely irrelevant in determining their quality.
5. Your original argument was based on bulk yards on bulk tds and was that LDT was signfincatly better than ADP
6. You are strawmanning my position to make it seem like all i care about is YPC
7. Sorry for making you count to 7.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:09 PM
ha ha ha
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Strictly based statistically, the 49ers are just about as middle of the back as it gets, and if it weren't for their run game, their offense would be borderline anemic. That makes them no better offensively than Minnesota, and I would argue that MIN's running offense is better than SFs anyway. Yes, I know they changed to Kaep midseason, but even his influence hasn't contributed to the passing game all THAT much.

The 49ers have some elite playmakers on defense, but their defense suffers greatly when any of those players are hampered. The 49ers are facing a brutal path to the SB, and their defense is going to have to go all out to win, because Kaep simply won't win a shootout with ARod and the like.

My NFC rankings are like this:

ATL
GB
SEA
SF
WAS
MIN

My AFC rankings are:

NE
DEN
HOU
IND
BAL
CIN

Overall

ATL
NE
DEN
GB
SEA
SF
HOU
IND
BAL
WAS
CIN
MIN
Oh really? "Strictly based statistically" the Niners are middle of the pack? Which stats are these exactly?

Yards per play: 6.0 (3rd)
Opponents' yards per play: 4.7 (3rd)
Offensive DVOA: 17.0% (5th)
Defensive DVOA: -14.3% (2nd)
Point differential: +124 (4th)
Strength of schedule: 6.3% (3rd)

Now, let's compare that to Atlanta:
Yards per play: 5.8 (7th)
Opponents' yards per play: 5.9 (29th)
Offensive DVOA: 6.1% (12th)
Defensive DVOA: -2.9% (12th)
Point differential: +120 (5th)
Strength of schedule: -4.3% (27th)

Seems like if anyone's "middle of the pack" statistically, it's Atlanta. San Francisco's statistics are pretty damn elite.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Well the Pro Bowl is at least 40% popularity driven. Its the same reason Jeff Saturday made it and he was benched this year.

I would take William Moore and Thomas DeCoud over the NFC PB safeties any day of the week.

Yes, titles are won in the trenches. Yes, SF is an 'in the trenches' kind of team, but they aren't the be all end all of football teams. They were shown up by Russell Wilson, who, while decent, is nowhere near an elite level QB mechanically or statistically.

The SF offense will have a LOT of trouble against any defensive coordinators who excel at scheming/adjusting to teams (like Mike Nolan). They are one-dimensional essentially, and every time the Falcons have sold out to stop the run on a team, they have won.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Look at their allowed scoring numbers.

The last game was obviously not played at full tempo/full playbook.

They crushed NYG in that span of 4 games you're referring to.

Matt Ryan has put up career numbers this season. Atlanta is near the top of the league in turnover differential.

Their defensive yardage numbers have been better than the Packers who won the SB. 24th isn't that bad when you compare it to 32nd. Yardage totals wont keep a team from winning games. Points do, and the Falcons are excellent at stopping drives and limiting opposing offenses to field goals.

Theyre also the least penalized team in the league, and for the most part play clean and mistake free.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
This is why SF is going to have trouble in the postseason. Their team is too hard on its defense, and it will end up breaking down.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Then what about SF and Den?

They have played a lot of weak teams and SF has even been beaten by them. Den was beaten by 3 of the top tier teams now... So does that suggest that Denver is better than the bad teams but not as good as the elite ones? What elite teams has Den beaten this season? Why are they being tauted as the best show on turf when they have obvious shortcomings and have already been beaten by multiple proven playoff contenders?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
That was the first time I had seen the brackets since the 4:30 games ended. I cant keep track of all of it in my head.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Strictly based statistically, the 49ers are just about as middle of the back as it gets, and if it weren't for their run game, their offense would be borderline anemic. That makes them no better offensively than Minnesota, and I would argue that MIN's running offense is better than SFs anyway. Yes, I know they changed to Kaep midseason, but even his influence hasn't contributed to the passing game all THAT much.

The 49ers have some elite playmakers on defense, but their defense suffers greatly when any of those players are hampered. The 49ers are facing a brutal path to the SB, and their defense is going to have to go all out to win, because Kaep simply won't win a shootout with ARod and the like.

My NFC rankings are like this:

ATL
GB
SEA
SF
WAS
MIN

My AFC rankings are:

NE
DEN
HOU
IND
BAL
CIN

Overall

ATL
NE
DEN
GB
SEA
SF
HOU
IND
BAL
WAS
CIN
MIN
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
I just said why SF is overrated.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
This

And this is why SF is at 6 on my rankings.

Its the same reason AP doesn't make MIN any higher than 12 on my list. A few individual elite players don't make a team, and SF isn't that great outside of those defensive powerhouses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Your thoughts are a result of your misconception of ATL.

Its fine. You'll see.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fanmail
still sucks that the vice grip cost the packers the bye, ugh
jfc, can pack fans stfu about this yet
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:24 PM
12 points for 1st, 1 point for 12th

1. Denver Broncos (17), AFC #1, 275 points
2. New England Patriots (4), AFC #2, 259 points
3. San Francisco 49ers, (1), NFC #2, 238 points
4. Green Bay Packers, NFC #3, 209 points
5. Seattle Seahawks (1), NFC #5, 195 points
6. Atlanta Falcons (1), NFC #1, 182 points
7. Houston Texans, AFC #3, 135 points
8. Washington Redskins, NFC #4, 108 points
9. Baltimore Ravens, AFC #4, 93 points
10. Cincinnati Bengals, AFC #6, 67 points
11. Minnesota Vikings, NFC #6, 61 points
12. Indianapolis Colts, AFC #5, 50 points

distribution:



MVP:

3 points for 1st, 1 point for 3rd

t1. Adrian Peterson (13), 52 points
t1. Peyton Manning (7), 52 points
3. Aaron Rodgers (1), 11 points
4. Tom Brady, 8 points
t5. Robert Griffin III (2), 7 points
t5. J.J. Watt, 7 points

distribution:

Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:29 PM
FAIL
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:32 PM
Serious statement: After all of this **** talking I am enduring, and all of this pining for my permaban for my opinions, I had better get some respect and apologies when the Falcons win.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:34 PM
I would already be permabanned if I were flailing insults and casting aspersions every single time someone disagreed with me.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:34 PM
FAIL
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by STA654
jfc, can pack fans stfu about this yet
The silver lining for them in their loss this past weekend is that it enables them to still blame that game for their seed fourteen weeks later. If they had won against Minnesota they would have lost that.

(Fanmail isn't a GB fan though.)
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Serious statement: After all of this **** talking I am enduring, and all of this pining for my permaban for my opinions, I had better get some respect and apologies when the Falcons win.
People are supposed to apologize for their stance of "Falcons are pretty good, other teams are better, they may win some home games and get to the SB anyway" if the Falcons win? That doesn't make sense. I don't see anybody saying that Atlanta has no chance, or anything close to that.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote
12-31-2012 , 09:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic
Serious statement: After all of this **** talking I am enduring, and all of this pining for my permaban for my opinions, I had better get some respect and apologies when the Falcons win.
Final NFL Rankings and Discussion thread Quote

      
m