i really fancy this venezuela Investment, was thinking about proposing something anti-brazil because
A) old people have all the money
B) they are stuck in their ways, therefore
C) they still think brazil is the best team in the world despite being them being a disgrace for a long time and having a star player who is a fanny and not even there, and so
D) they use their money to place unsound Investments on brazil thereby artificially skewing der markt
sadly its not garnering many votes at this time
Thank you for the support CEO BOIDS. To counter the sometimes questionable judgement of the firm, I have opened a private portfolio in which I action investments deemed not worthy of the collective firm.
of course, there will be a reconciliation when voting closes and any non-Partner votes will be EXPUNGED. further any partners who cast in excess of the permitted number of votes will be EXPOSED and their votes EXPUNGED
I really love the idea of shorting the worst investment proposals on a weekly basis, except that we'll be shorting all sorts of events that are roughly 100% to occur just because the potential return had we invested in them was not worth the unavailability of capital for such a pitiful return.
Or, put differently, we're going to have lots of losing shorts.
I really love the idea of shorting the worst investment proposals on a weekly basis, except that we'll be shorting all sorts of events that are roughly 100% to occur just because the potential return had we invested in them was not worth the unavailability of capital for such a pitiful return.
Or, put differently, we're going to have lots of losing shorts.
Agreed. I think this should be under special proposal rules for the particularly egregious suggestions which our shareholders revolt against.
i recognise that most Partners likely do not want Capital tied up long-term
this is not a problem we need to legislate for at the top end - if Partners truly do not want something then they wont vote for it and it won't be Actioned. the ballot box sorts it out.
unfortunately, if unloved Investments are to be faded, no such protection exists on the other end. we may end up prosecuting unpopular Capital-intensive fade Investments via the back door
look i think it's imperative that a 1% fade of the most unloved Proposal is Actioned, starting next week. the voting process delivers ultra high quality information on both ends and it would be negligent not to take advantage of resultant costless Capital Opportunities
there does exist a solution, and that solution will be found before next week's vote
I do have a question. How were you expecting to get this Brazil bet pushed thru? It starts in 2 hours lol. I’m not opposed to that one but seems nearly impossible to back given timing
Brazil was the most predictable result. That spread was outrageous. Gifted the firm 2 rock solid Investnents that paid off and we got losers holding out for esports. Smh. Upgrade me to the 8bus perturbation stratosphere
I haven't logged in on a desktop pc in two years so the voting will be happening without me.
Are you using Tapatalk? Just tap on the OP, press more then web view and voila you can use the poll (I personally voted using this advance method fwiw)