Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
watched a full replay
impossible to overtake. unspeakably bad. bottas in 15th and with a car which was more than 2 seconds/lap quicker than everyone around him in qualifying couldn't overtake anyone. unbelievable. this isn't monaco
poor kimi. i thought ferrari HQ turning his car off for 3 seconds in canada last year so seb could overtake him was peak shenanigans, but getting their junior haas team in on the plotting is genius. a whole new layer of duplicity
dont know how they are going to address this overtaking problem. max's spin early was clearly because he just wouldn't accept the fact that you cannot put sustained pressure on the bloke in front cos your **** overheats and the car becomes undrivable. current formula punishes hard aggressive driving. depressing
the v6 engines in these things spit out about 850hp, which is inferior to the v10s of the mid 2000s and massively inferior to the v12s of the late 1980s, and yet lap times have never been quicker. lewis' pole lap this year was five and a half seconds quicker than his pole lap in 2008. all of that five and a half seconds is down to advances in aero performance, plus more because of the horsepower deficit from now to then. and when you drive behind an f1 car which is belching hot air into your front wing, most of that aero advantage gets ****ed up. this is why it's ****ing impossible to overtake, and getting harder each year cos all the development is towards aero
the two solutions i can see are 1) entirely new design philosophy such that aero becomes much less important, not gonna happen any time soon cos you either make the cars really slow (not happening), or you go back to massive engines (no good according to merc/renault/ferrari because the huge engine technology has no road car application blah blah). 2) stop making tyres which degrade on purpose, just give them **** which lasts forever and never overheats. still got the aero problem but at least they would be able to push on the tyres. this removes tyre strategy tho which causes a whole host of other problems. probably got to go back to refuelling days. wont happen cos safety
slightly depressing. but anyway i'm still enthused for the next race
btw stream the uk broadcast if you can, no adverts
Agree, was very disappointed. Good track - bad race, fast cars stuck behind slow ones, winner decided by luckbox.
Halo doesn't look so bad when it's exterior views of cars on track. The on-board camera is a horrendous eyesore however. Should probably move it to the front of the halo or something so it doesn't need to be seen.
Even more depressing to hear of even more "cost saving measures" and now it's only 3 engines per year and even less of some components. A lot of problems may be fixed if it didn't matter if they thrashed the balls of the cars in any given race.
Other things they could try:
Increase DRS detection from the current 1 second to 2-3 or something. It's obvious a car can't keep within 1 second even for any length of time without great sacrifices to the tires and engine heat.
Extend DRS hugely and allow "fully active aero" or other such active components, suspension etc. Currently a car's aero balance is destroyed by not having "clean air" - if it could reconfigure it's wing angles etc by driver input to enable "follow close mode" or some such various settings depending on the current state of air the car has to travel in.