Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinarocket
What are you going to blame for picking Mane over Salah at the same price
I'm not in any money leagues, so went contrarian since mane is 3% owned vs Salah being like 50%+. In a vacuum Salah is obviously a better pick than mane, but if you want to take the high variance route you'll make massive leaps over the field at those ownership differences if Salah underperforms even a slight bit (or mane over performs). Unfortunately Salah is over performing and mane is underperforming but the underlying numbers don't warrant the ownership discrepancy. In actuality the better play would be to just have both as most people that have Salah won't also have mane.