Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckSauce
I think there's a lot of nuance and gray area in certain decisions. Most of the time I'm able to see the refs side and understand why a call was made even if I might disagree. This wasn't one of them. There's no world in which this shouldn't be called a hand ball and a penalty and it's egregiously bad to not do so.
I don't think so...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Paul
Even I think it should've been a penalty. I do understand why it wasn't given though.
Look at the situation, ball is played up at shoulder height, they're pretty much touching each other as well. I don't see how he can realistically react and remove his arm away in that situation. He's moving his left leg as well to 'block' the path.
That's why it hasn't been given and I can see them not awarding similar ones in the future either - unless they change the rules to a similar thing to the hockey one 64 mentioned above which would ruin the game IMO