Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
English Football 2018-19, Football that is already Home English Football 2018-19, Football that is already Home

08-19-2018 , 03:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingweed
That's the attitude that has allowed your club to fall behind 4 clubs who 10-15 years ago you'd laugh at.

Heck even 2-3 years ago you'd be laughing at two of them.

Chelsea and Plop have spent that on a goalkeeper this summer. £60m isn't a lot to be spending on players now if you want to compete for the league.
spending 100 million per year haven't helped your club past our level other than running like the sun to capture silver once.

Maybe Mourinho and the 2-3 other managers should have spent their money more wisely?

As an outsider it seems more of a case of Mourinho failed rather than "we didn't have enough money spent on transfers during his reign". Correct me if I'm wrong.
Quarter of a billion net spent in three years is not bad at all.
08-19-2018 , 03:11 PM
theory: ev1 in football is motivated a combo of having joy for the game and wanting to prove the critics wrong

mourinho is like 1% joy 99% proving people wrong
ronaldinho is 99%/1% the other way

likability can be directly measured on this metric
08-19-2018 , 03:12 PM
TJ, the correct way to pick a team is to RNG amongst the 92
08-19-2018 , 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingweed
That's the attitude that has allowed your club to fall behind 4 clubs who 10-15 years ago you'd laugh at.

Heck even 2-3 years ago you'd be laughing at two of them.

Chelsea and Plop have spent that on a goalkeeper this summer. £60m isn't a lot to be spending on players now if you want to compete for the league.
Seems like you guys are taking the fast track to us. Welcome.

Also pretty sure most clubs take that approach when they expose themselves financially... New stadium. See spuds this year. What does United have to pay apart from Mou when they fire him?
08-19-2018 , 03:54 PM
ok, giving this man city documentary a go. Amazon prime goat btw

First feedback, 3 minutes in is that Pep could be a professional clown if he wanted to
08-19-2018 , 04:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinarocket

First feedback, 3 minutes in is that Pep could be a professional clown if he wanted to
mou is a professional clown eventhough he doesnt want to be one
08-19-2018 , 04:15 PM
Only available manager is Conte.

Dont think he would like the equaliser any more than Mou.
08-19-2018 , 04:24 PM
Lol.

08-19-2018 , 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.A.F.K.1.1
Only available manager is Conte.
Spoiler:
08-19-2018 , 04:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckSauce
without a healthy kane they will struggle a bit.
I think it would only be a bit. We actually looked really good in the few games we played without Kane in the second half of last season - Dele, Son, Moura and Lamela make a very fluid attacking band, and there is no way Llorente sees meaningful minutes even if Kane does go down.

We haven't looked very good in our opening games, but we've ground out 6 points. We will only get better once our WC players have reached full fitness.
08-19-2018 , 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Consty
Lol.

It is funny, but at the same time I would like to see managers call out sports journos more often for using horrible lazy cliches.
08-19-2018 , 04:41 PM
theres a rumour going round that spuds new stadium looks like a toilet seat



discuss
08-19-2018 , 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOIDS
theres a rumour going round that spuds new stadium looks like a toilet seat



discuss
A more than fitting home for the Spurs
08-19-2018 , 04:48 PM
08-19-2018 , 04:50 PM
Uhh spurs performances towards the end of the year after kane injury took a massive nose dive.

1.78 NPxG/game .77 NPxA/game with kane first 30 games.


1.3 NPxG/game 1.26 NPxA/game last 8 games post kane injury.

Kane also did not look great at the world cup. His shot volume has plummeted since the injury from > 6 p90 to ~3ish p90.

Will double check the numbers later as I'm on my phone ATM.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elrazor
I think it would only be a bit. We actually looked really good in the few games we played without Kane in the second half of last season - Dele, Son, Moura and Lamela make a very fluid attacking band, and there is no way Llorente sees meaningful minutes even if Kane does go down.

We haven't looked very good in our opening games, but we've ground out 6 points. We will only get better once our WC players have reached full fitness.
08-19-2018 , 04:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mw828
I think we are basically a CM and a backup striker from being about as good as we can be within our means. Winks is going to have to make a leap this year to be a very solid option, and Kane can't go down for big games because Sonny is our next best option. It's a real shame because we probably could have got someone for only 15m that would have given us a rotation option in the CM.
i basically think spurs should be at the atletico madrid level and there's enough there already that they could be if they just spent some of the pl £££. a top class cm and forward/winger should be possible. maybe 130-140m + wages.

it wouldn't be at the risk of doing a leeds or whatever some people here think. it would just mean some of the profit sacrificed for really going for it with this generation
08-19-2018 , 05:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Most MLS teams are about the level of the bottom of the championship (division below the pl)
nah, pretty much every MLS team is better than Bumley, so...
08-19-2018 , 05:03 PM
Confident for top 4; at the same time watching arse cut through us quite easily at times had an AVB-vibe to it (iirc arse beat us 5-3 that year too; could’ve gone that way).
08-19-2018 , 05:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckSauce
Uhh spurs performances towards the end of the year after kane injury took a massive nose dive.
Yeah, we're arguing similar things then. My eye test says we looked pretty good in Kane's absence, and when he came back too soon we didn't look nearly as fluid.

Anyway, we're going to score goals with or without Kane, and even if Toby phones it in this season we still probably have 3 of the top 10 CBs ITL*, so we'll be fine.

Last edited by Elrazor; 08-19-2018 at 05:08 PM. Reason: *probably top 5
08-19-2018 , 05:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckSauce
Uhh spurs performances towards the end of the year after kane injury took a massive nose dive.

1.78 NPxG/game .77 NPxA/game with kane first 30 games.


1.3 NPxG/game 1.26 NPxA/game last 8 games post kane injury.

Kane also did not look great at the world cup. His shot volume has plummeted since the injury from > 6 p90 to ~3ish p90.

Will double check the numbers later as I'm on my phone ATM.
1.9 points/game with Kane first 30 games with 1.97 goals/game

2.0 points/game last 8 games post Kane injury with 1.88 goals/game
08-19-2018 , 05:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBlow
1.9 points/game with Kane first 30 games with 1.97 goals/game

2.0 points/game last 8 games post Kane injury with 1.88 goals/game
So basically they are better off without Kane! Don't let them find out tho

#tabledontlie

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72off
nah, pretty much every MLS team is better than Bumley, so...
you are talking about the 7th best team in England

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZAIDS
Confident for top 4; at the same time watching arse cut through us quite easily at times had an AVB-vibe to it (iirc arse beat us 5-3 that year too; could’ve gone that way).
Could have gone either way. Way to early to tell which team will **** the bed tho. Today's ManU game should be very encouraging for us top4 seekers though
08-19-2018 , 06:27 PM
I feel real good about mun not getting top 4, I think che ars and spuds are reasonably close with ars prob in it's current state being the weakest of the bunch. I think arsenal and Chelsea have the highest ceiling for improvement where as spurs at full strength is a known quantity (and would favor them over current strength Chelsea and arsenal if spurs were full strength.)
08-19-2018 , 06:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckSauce
Uhh spurs performances towards the end of the year after kane injury took a massive nose dive.

1.78 NPxG/game .77 NPxA/game with kane first 30 games.


1.3 NPxG/game 1.26 NPxA/game last 8 games post kane injury.

Kane also did not look great at the world cup. His shot volume has plummeted since the injury from > 6 p90 to ~3ish p90.

Will double check the numbers later as I'm on my phone ATM.
Educate me on why you are citing xA stats at the team level. How does it matter if it a chance was assisted/unassisted?
08-19-2018 , 07:01 PM
Iwobi definitely put on a bunch of muscle during the off season. He's the type of player who could improve a lot with a more structured manager.

Really loving Guendouzi. Torreirra might end up being better, but these are the two best CM we've bought in over 5 years.
08-19-2018 , 07:05 PM
Is this where we LOLUTD?

      
m