that is bad goalkeeping

hey kingweed you dolt how about you acknowledge the first part and how ****ing correct it is

KUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN

sweet og bro

I think (trigger warning

Caley made an interesting point on twitter earlier that the City FBs are quite involved in shutting down opposing counters- so while Sané and Sterling are certain offensive upgrades, having them in there doing zero work going back might have you look like last season's City when you lose the ball with the CBs within 30 meters of the opposing goal

rough couple of mins for the brave english lads at brighton

Give Bernardo some ****ing run

He's got him coming on for aguero

Lol

Easy to see how lost most are out there with pep lining them up as ******s

Injury time equaliser denied due to terrible offside call ffs

Yes bus, Sane really changed the flow of the ****ing game.
You're a genious and Pep is a fraud, got it...

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Good to see the usual measured response to anything other than a curbstomping from 8b.

I also had the thought that one of the several £50m players on the bench might do something if they came off the bench. When do me and 8bus sign up to be PL managers?

Yeah it has less to do with him "changing the flow of the game" and more to do with the fact that two full backs were playing as wingers va full back and Brighton were playing accordingly. An actual attacking player comes in and to no ones surprise that happens. I hope that helps

That lineup may work better vs Spurs pool etc but it's functionally ******ed against Brighton.

Haha. Reading the thread one would have thought City were losing

WBA dream summer - acquired moar CBs and switch single-digit-goals-total striker

WBA running goal totals:

Real goals (i.e. scored by CBs)	1
fripperies (scored by lolAMs etc)	0

wtf at that cahill red :/

So apparently Sky's analysis of this call is genius - the best angle that they have of the incident is their goal line technology camera (right), alas it doesn't have Duffy taking the free kick in shot, so their guys split screen in another, slightly different angle from one of their regular cameras (left), claim these are the same frame and ergo O'Connell is offside, because we can't just draw a line ourselves between the defenders and see he's on it and hence being played on. Not sure what their agenda is with this, and why they think we won't notice our front post attacker having both feet in the six yard box in one and not in another, Clarke (back post just outside six yard box) being at arms length in the left picture and being wrestled with in the right...

Whenever this thread looks like a baseball forum in 2008 it's hilarious how far behind some people are.

hey TP this might be peak burnley mate

beating the prem champs away + venkys losing 2-1 to put them in the league one relegation zone with no points

could be all downhill from here

Venkys lost 3-1 mate.

xG making it's debut on MOTD.

Looks like a red to me. His studs are up and hit the shins. Super dangerous.

think its more clumsy than dangerous + not cynical, clear yellow for me

Agree it's probably not malicious bit definitely reckless, red is fine imo