Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
English Football 2016-2017: NOW WITH 100% LESS FANERIO English Football 2016-2017: NOW WITH 100% LESS FANERIO

08-30-2016 , 05:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopie1
I understand that they don't like being referred to as the scotch. Hence they are the scotch.
Haha obviously.

Glad the holding hands pic didn't make an appearance.
08-30-2016 , 05:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixfour
joke trophy update - swansea's starting eleven had squad numbers adding up to 340 more than the attendance

and apparently it goes straight to pens, despite being a group stage. in unsurprising news, we still can't take penalties
The fans are obviously impressed with the new format:

Bolton 0 Everton 2 - attendance 1,540
Fleetwood 1 Blackburn 0 - attendance 392 (lol Venkys)
Bury 4 Morecambe 1 - attendance 1,154
Blackpool 2 Cheltenham 0 - attendance 760
Oldham 4 Carlisle 5 - attendance 1,897
Accrington 0 Crewe 3 - attendance 585
08-30-2016 , 05:51 PM
To be fair, that Oldham game was probably quite exciting
08-30-2016 , 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiMor29
Yeah this. Was leaning towards using my wildcard after the international break now it's all but a certainty!
While we're on FPLAIDS I'm quickly remember why I don't do this ****.

So if I buy low on a player and his value goes up I'm forced to sell on his low price then buy him back on his high price? Like I see Aguero is 13.1 to buy atm (which will obv drop soon) but if I transfer him out it's only 13.0 that I get? Coutinho 8.2 but I can only sell for 8.1, Hazard 10.2 but can only sell for 10.1? But then donks like Callum Wilson who I bought for 6.5 and dropped to 6.4 I only get 6.4 for selling? **** is wack
08-30-2016 , 06:05 PM
you sell for half the profit. So if you bought at 13.0and he was trading at 13.2 now, you'd be selling at 13.1. Basically he needs to go up by 0.2m for you to see a benefit.

So selling a guy then buying him back is generally going to cost you money (unless his value collapses, which Kun's might well in this case)
08-30-2016 , 06:15 PM
I found last year life in fpl was so much easier when you gave yourself extra Sal in the bank. I think sal optimization isn't as important as people make it out to be since it changes every week and the value of flexibility in week to week transfers is > to maximize fixture edge.
08-30-2016 , 06:20 PM
I just never really understood why you only get half the profit. I like rewarding the players for getting their picks right so that bigger team budget caps are being created and you can make more of a difference.

For example the people who had mahrez to start with last season will feel that they weren't rewarded enough for the amazing pick and they didn't gain as much value on non-mahrez owners as they could have because it's very easy to adjust and pick mahrez once he starts scoring goals
08-30-2016 , 06:27 PM
I agree. I guess discouraging the market-playing aspect to focus on on-field action would be the simplistic explanation, but it reduces the strategy value of the game.
08-30-2016 , 11:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostOstrich
you sell for half the profit. So if you bought at 13.0and he was trading at 13.2 now, you'd be selling at 13.1. Basically he needs to go up by 0.2m for you to see a benefit.

So selling a guy then buying him back is generally going to cost you money (unless his value collapses, which Kun's might well in this case)
Yea well this is stupid but also doesn't make sense that if your player drops 0.1 you sell for 0.1 less. It doesn't work both ways. Fpl the worst. Draft or bust
08-31-2016 , 01:05 AM
Anyone know if fanny has a team somewhere? Want to see how I'm doing against the experts
08-31-2016 , 02:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBlow
Aside from Larsson, name one of those 'quality' players of which you speak.
Aside from the many already mentioned, how can anyone forget



Moved to Rangers long after the European ban on English clubs ended and arguably at his peak.
08-31-2016 , 02:31 AM
It absolutely wasn't his peak though. Gazza was already on the way out when he went to rangers.
08-31-2016 , 02:59 AM
So has cashy officially flew the nest? Has he contacted anyone since?
08-31-2016 , 06:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giroudgeous
It absolutely wasn't his peak though. Gazza was already on the way out when he went to rangers.
These ignoramuses think goals in Scotland mean the same as in decent leagues.
08-31-2016 , 06:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin21
So has cashy officially flew the nest? Has he contacted anyone since?
I can't imagine that anyone is going to be seeing those funds. He hasn't logged in for a week. I don't know how much it is that is owed but it must be less than $1k and it has been outstanding for over three months.
08-31-2016 , 08:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin21
So has cashy officially flew the nest? Has he contacted anyone since?
We should ask Bertie whether hes a thief yet or how long do we have to wait to find out

Having had multiple experiences like this, I'd say its very likely the money is gone
08-31-2016 , 08:20 AM
My suggestion is that we make a booking in cashy's restaurant for 3 people (the 3 winners of IKTS), they then proceed to order food for exactly the same amount as the prizepool and leave the restaurant without paying the bill

Obviously before leaving they should write "pay back is done" on their bill
08-31-2016 , 08:21 AM
08-31-2016 , 08:23 AM
Yeah let's rob Cashy's boss.

Last edited by unwantedguest; 08-31-2016 at 08:24 AM. Reason: Nah but I'd kidnap his cat for ransom.
08-31-2016 , 08:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by martymc1
Yeah let's rob Cashy's boss.
leave a URL to the thread so they know where their money is
08-31-2016 , 08:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by martymc1
Nah but I'd kidnap his cat for ransom.
During international break!
08-31-2016 , 09:19 AM
His cat died ages ago
08-31-2016 , 09:20 AM
****. There's nothing worse than losing a pet
08-31-2016 , 09:31 AM
Cashy still not repaid anyone? What a scumbag.
08-31-2016 , 09:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by joejoe1337
****. There's nothing worse than losing a pet
How about not getting paid your IKTS winnings because the chef that is holding them is simply TOO BUSY to cough up?

      
m