Quote:
Originally Posted by BAIDS
its the mun 2013/14 thing all over again i reckon, some runbad plus a load of people went from 9/10 performers to old and ****ty in the space of one summer:
diego costa is now in his late 30s and completely useless
fabregas started playing 60 games a season for wenger when he was about 14 years old and is following in the footsteps of others who took on too much too early such as rooney and torres
capt racist bellend has gone all rio for qpr
ivanovic is nearly 32 and looks finished
the good news is that de bruyne and lukaku are having great seasons, bad news is that the dummy in charge sold them so he could one day pay falcao £270k/week
I've been making this point (well, a similar one) to my IRL friends recently.
Imagine Mourinho retired at the end of last season, and Chelsea appointed a new manager with a proven track record of spending wisely and consistently over-achieving with a lower-midtable club (but who had never actually won any trophies because, well, he was managing a lower-midtable club). Someone like, say, David Moyes circa 2013.
The new manager would be getting torn to pieces, and would most likely have been sacked weeks ago. When in reality, the squad had peaked last season and every last drop of rungood had been squeezed out. The terrible results this season are a combination of negative variance, natural decline, loss of confidence and a manager under increasing pressure. The only difference is this time there isn't some poor sap at the top who's just taken over at the wrong time to take all the blame.
I'm a self-confessed Moyes fanboy, and I know I'm over-simplifying this for the sake of my narrative. But I think the point stands that what's happening to Chelsea this season goes some way to supporting my contention that Moyes was terribly unlucky to take over at United at the time he did, and I will maintain that the man is/was an excellent Premier League manager as long as there is breath in my body.