Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
English Football 2015-16 - Leicester City won the league English Football 2015-16 - Leicester City won the league

10-26-2015 , 05:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Consty
Not quite as black and white as that. I think I'm one of the very few who trades sport on here but I use xG as an indicator for price movement.
It's just such an awful, awful post. Nate Silver is probably the most mainstream stats guy out there and he posted/got started on 2p2.
10-26-2015 , 05:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFC_USA
Put $10 on Cardiff to have a rooting interest in this Championship match. The football is pretty bad, but I love how much the referees let them play
It has been dreadful, hasn't it? Watching Cardiff toiling makes me even more thankful that I'm not Welsh.
10-26-2015 , 05:19 PM
i finally remembered what this stats based spudsboom reminded me of - 2013/14 aka the suarez season aka the pool +5 points season

10-26-2015 , 05:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopie1
It has been dreadful, hasn't it? Watching Cardiff toiling makes me even more thankful that I'm not Welsh.
Yea some dreadful stuff. Seen Bristol miss about 6 free headers
10-26-2015 , 05:35 PM
I've watched Athletic tear up Gijon instead. No regrets
10-26-2015 , 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MindFckr
I've watched Athletic tear up Gijon instead. No regrets
Yep same here.
10-26-2015 , 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAIDS
i reckon at some point in the not too distant future one of those new fangled computing devices will be able to spit out a number which will contain everything we need to know about how much a player contributes regardless of the position they play. identifying the talent level of a player will be a trivial matter. this will mean that effective team construction will simply be a matter of identifying good character. brendan rodgers will become the best manager of all time.
Just play out the season on Excel
10-26-2015 , 07:01 PM
Totally forgot Scolari signed a multi year deal as well before getting the sack. £16m for eight months. lol Chelsea.
10-26-2015 , 07:23 PM
what is a worcester city and why are we playing them
10-26-2015 , 07:40 PM
They're a **** lower league team. You're playing them because you're also a **** lower league team.
10-26-2015 , 07:46 PM
Think someones made
10-26-2015 , 08:42 PM
10-27-2015 , 12:23 AM
Our analytics guys passed on Mané 15 months ago. They have a use, but way too much influence at elite clubs for such a young industry.
10-27-2015 , 03:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilfred1
Think someones made
Me? I'm not mad, I think it's funny!
10-27-2015 , 03:14 AM
Pipe down fellow Spurs fans.

With several bigger clubs in transition/disarray, and Spurs team settled enough that we have gone 9 unbeaten including humping the title favourites, it's obviously RAWK-style boom talk for us to consider the possibility of improving one place on last season's finish.
10-27-2015 , 03:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinarocket
This is just my opinion but from what I've noticed there's been a weird tendency itt where xG becomes the truth and the only truth. Such metric is there to help understanding results, everybody knows it has value everybody (should) knows it has flaws but analytics is all about context, you use the stats to help formulating hypothesis and opinions, the stats ARE NOT the opinion by themselves. Just my 2 cents I suspect most people are aware of this but i dunno i sometimes I read stuff and I wonder if people haven't been brainwashed by Ducksauce thinking that xG will give you 100% of the answer to your questions.
I agree there is far too much of this thinking ITT, and perhaps in football generally. If you're taking a decent critical approach, you consider both inductive and deductive approaches, so sometimes the question is data driven, and sometimes theory driven.



So a good example of using data to drive a theory was Comoli purportedly signing Henderson and Downing because they had good recovery stats in the final third. That information is useful, but it doesn't make them good players.

If you're judging players it's far better to use the the deductive approach, use the eye test first up, and then when you think you've identified a good player, see if the stats agree. If you take the inductive approach and check the stats first, then you will have already formed an opinion about that player and the conclusions of your eye-test will probably be biased - as well as possibly ignoring other decent players on show.
10-27-2015 , 04:14 AM
It's such a lazy attack that cinarocket has done over and over again that he seems to think people who like to look at advance stats just completely rely on them.

xG is a great indicator to future success. Is it perfect? No, but it's also being worked on and made better every single day. Caley posts how he does it. He updates how he does it. Other people have slightly different models. I understand how some people don't like it, but read this article by him: http://cartilagefreecaptain.sbnation...051.1444936826

Has something better been written by anyone this season? People who rely on stats can be wrong, but the ones who are worth anything are seeing where they are wrong and continually improving their methodology.
10-27-2015 , 04:53 AM
Yeah I use Caley.

ElRazor, I'm finishing up Fergie's latest book, he has a section on stats and he clearly used the deductive approach.
10-27-2015 , 05:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
xG is a great indicator to future success. Is it perfect? No, but it's also being worked on and made better every single day. Caley posts how he does it. He updates how he does it. Other people have slightly different models. I understand how some people don't like it, but read this article by him: http://cartilagefreecaptain.sbnation...051.1444936826
From his method:

Quote:
The main way I try to improve the method is watching lots of football and then talking to people about it.

So, my touchstone throughout the (extended) process of developing this method was "does this make football sense?" I am by training something of a skeptic of regression methods. It is very easy to find "significant" effects when you do regression willy-nilly, but that doesn't mean that what you've found is actually a real finding about football. While obviously I had to do lots of regression to create this system, I tried to make sure I was only running regressions when I understood why and how the factors involved related to the creation of better and worse chances in a football match.
So this is exactly what I was talking about. This method is clearly driven by theory and watching football. Seems obvious, but as he says, it's really easy to just throw a lot of numbers into a regression and find things that are statistically significant. Ben Goldacre does a good job of explaining why that's bad here.
10-27-2015 , 05:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeDiego
Yeah I use Caley.

ElRazor, I'm finishing up Fergie's latest book, he has a section on stats and he clearly used the deductive approach.
Is it good (for a non homer)?
10-27-2015 , 05:18 AM
Elrazor, my point is that cinarocket and you as well are railing against things nobody are doing.
As you note, the people behind these stats watch as much football as anyone on earth
10-27-2015 , 05:23 AM
Nobody in football, or nobody itt?

Either way, I think you're wrong. People consistently use stats to drive arguments, rather than create arguments supplemented by stats.
10-27-2015 , 05:36 AM
Yea, but they don't have masters.

---

Looking at the training pictures and reports, seems like the core apart from Mert, Cech, Walcott will get a complete rest, which I'm delighted about.

Starting team will most likely feature most of the following players:

Joel Campbell, Chambers, Debuchy, Gibbs, Iwobi, Bielik, Flamini and a couple more youngsters

Can't watch the game live, but I hope I can get a spoiler free place to download the game from. Prolly rojadirecta
10-27-2015 , 05:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MindFckr
Can't watch the game live, but I hope I can get a spoiler free place to download the game from. Prolly rojadirecta
If you lose I'll happily spoiler you via Twitter. Or carrier pigeon if you have no internet/phone access.
10-27-2015 , 05:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopie1
If you lose I'll happily spoiler you via Twitter. Or carrier pigeon if you have no internet/phone access.
Spoiler:

      
m