Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
English Football 2015-16 - Leicester City won the league English Football 2015-16 - Leicester City won the league

10-12-2015 , 12:29 AM
I remember all games of the chile World Cup qualifying campaign for France 98 and it began when I was 7.
10-12-2015 , 12:33 AM
In fact I can tell you every competitive game Chile has play since 1995 and the winner of game. Exact scores may be wrong.
10-12-2015 , 12:34 AM
That's very very impressive. My memory must just be ****.
10-12-2015 , 12:37 AM
I have a sick long term memory. However if I read something today I won't remember it tomorrow.
For instance every time I discuss in which year something happened I'm always right. I got the skill from my mom. She has lost some of her mojo lately now that she he is her late 50s( will be 60 next month in fact).

Edit: I also know the bracket of every World Cup since 1994

Last edited by valenzuela; 10-12-2015 at 12:45 AM.
10-12-2015 , 12:50 AM
Groups were iirc:

A: USA Switzerland Romania Colombia

B: Brazil Cameroon Sweden Russia

C: Germany Spain Bolivia South Korea

D: Argentina Nigeria Bulgaria Greece

E: Italy Mexico Ireland Norway

F: holland Belgium Saudi Arabia morocco

Then

Brazil > USA
Holland > Ireland
Sweden > Saudi Arabia
Romania > Argentina
Italy > Nigeria
Spain > Switzerland
Bulgaria > Mexico
Germany > Belgium

Then the team in top wins the tie. ( Brazil beats holland , Sweden beats Romania etc)
10-12-2015 , 02:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tchaz
"you have to have a trick"

WOAT colour commentator oat
He's a better commentator than he was a manager though.

It was 18 years ago yesterday that he got his first league win as a manager, the same day England were drawing 0-0 in Rome to qualify for the World Cup. Almost the middle of October after being appointed in the summer, what a disaster he was.
10-12-2015 , 02:54 AM
Lol hh

Greats of the game would easily make it in this era, better boots, balls, pitches etc would only help improve their techniques and what not.

Players use to get the utter **** kicked out of them as players couldn't get near them, even 15-20 years ago.

I seen a tackle from Jones on vine last night where he completely took McManaman out. Not even a yellow.

If players where able to nail Messi without any consequences to stop him he wouldn't be nearly as effective! He'd still GOAT it up and be too quick for some, just like the greats of the game.
10-12-2015 , 03:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
There's a theory that has a lot of support regarding ELO ratings that posits inflation as endemic in the ratings system, and that you shouldn't compare ratings between players of different eras.

To take an extreme example, if you go back (as some have) and rate all players in all tournaments from year dot, Capablanca/Alekhine/Lasker, some of the strongest WC of all time, hardly break 2700. There are 44 players in the world now rated at least 2700:

http://2700chess.com/

EDIT: sorry for derail
This really good example reminds me of the Bannister story. Before Rodger Bannister, It was thought that it was physiological impossible for a human to run a mile in less than 4 minutes, and at that point no one in history had done it.

Bannister was an Oxford medical student who thought different. Obviously the rest is history, but after Bannister ran a 4 minute mile, in the next 12 months something like 30 more runners broke the barrier.

This obviously wasn't a result of a leap forward in physiology - the only thing that changed was people's beliefs, as someone changed the parameters of what was possible.

-------------------------

WRT football, it's worth noting that 25 years ago an ACL injury was touch and go the end of your career. Illustrates how far medical knowledge and practice has advanced.
10-12-2015 , 04:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Human Halo
I read that in 1986 Nigel Short's highest ELO rating was 3rd in the world. By 2000 his rating wouldn't have been in the top 50, probably top 100 now but I haven't checked.
His rating then, dunno, there's been rating inflation. Short's current rating is top 100 fwiw
10-12-2015 , 04:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by valenzuela
I have a sick long term memory. However if I read something today I won't remember it tomorrow.
For instance every time I discuss in which year something happened I'm always right. I got the skill from my mom. She has lost some of her mojo lately now that she he is her late 50s( will be 60 next month in fact).

Edit: I also know the bracket of every World Cup since 1994
I'm the same, I used to freak out my parents by describing the spines of books that were visible from my cot as a baby and the weird texture our carpet had at a house we left when I was 2, from when I was crawling.

Introduce me to someone now and I will likely not remember their name a few hours later.
I'm 41 and remember a lot of Spain 82, but Mexico 86 is what I refer to as 'my World Cup' in that it was the one I first obsessed with and can remember weird stuff about.

In 1986, Carlos Manuel being the Portugese scorer in England's opening loss. 3 teams made it through that 4 team group. Portugal missed out, bizarrely.

Even more bizarre was 1982.
England won their opening group with a 100% record, only conceding a single goal (v France).
They still managed to get knocked before the semi finals despite not losing a game or indeed conceding another goal.

That 1982 Brazil team were a joy to watch, but plagued as they they were for years for not having a decent goalkeeper.

Last edited by PeteBlow; 10-12-2015 at 04:35 AM.
10-12-2015 , 05:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingweed
Lol hh

Greats of the game would easily make it in this era, better boots, balls, pitches etc would only help improve their techniques and what not.

Players use to get the utter **** kicked out of them as players couldn't get near them, even 15-20 years ago.

I seen a tackle from Jones on vine last night where he completely took McManaman out. Not even a yellow.

If players where able to nail Messi without any consequences to stop him he wouldn't be nearly as effective! He'd still GOAT it up and be too quick for some, just like the greats of the game.
Lol KW

My argument isn't whether they could make it today, my point was that lol to any old time great even being considered for the GOAT or as good as the elite of today.
10-12-2015 , 05:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Human Halo
Lol KW



My argument isn't whether they could make it today, my point was that lol to any old time great even being considered for the GOAT or as good as the elite of today.

Which is my point, those guys who where elite with the disadvantages of those days would be even better now.

To say that every single player now is better is just laughable. Like you're statement on Rooney being England's greatest ever player.
10-12-2015 , 05:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elrazor
This really good example reminds me of the Bannister story. Before Rodger Bannister, It was thought that it was physiological impossible for a human to run a mile in less than 4 minutes, and at that point no one in history had done it.

Bannister was an Oxford medical student who thought different. Obviously the rest is history, but after Bannister ran a 4 minute mile, in the next 12 months something like 30 more runners broke the barrier.

This obviously wasn't a result of a leap forward in physiology - the only thing that changed was people's beliefs, as someone changed the parameters of what was possible.

-------------------------

WRT football, it's worth noting that 25 years ago an ACL injury was touch and go the end of your career. Illustrates how far medical knowledge and practice has advanced.
Quote:
The claim that a 4-minute mile was once thought to be impossible by informed observers was and is a widely propagated myth created by sportswriters and debunked by Bannister himself in his memoir, The Four Minute Mile (1955). The reason the myth took hold was that four minutes was a round number which was slightly better (1.4 seconds) than the world record for nine years, longer than it probably otherwise would have been because of the effect of World War II in interrupting athletic progress in the combatant countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_...-4-minute_mile
10-12-2015 , 05:57 AM
god, the "best player" discussion is so boring and always comes down to the same problem of people evaluating a players quality in absolute terms and therefore always overrating the current generation.(messi goat ainec, federer/nadal/djoko all goat lol etc etc)
10-12-2015 , 06:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashy
god, the "best player" discussion is so boring and always comes down to the same problem of people evaluating a players quality in absolute terms and therefore always overrating the current generation.(messi goat ainec, federer/nadal/djoko all goat lol etc etc)
Can someone write this down and nail it to HH's forehead please? Preferably with a really long nail.
10-12-2015 , 06:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingweed
Which is my point, those guys who where elite with the disadvantages of those days would be even better now.

To say that every single player now is better is just laughable. Like you're statement on Rooney being England's greatest ever player.
No it isn't though. Just because players in the 1970-80s were fouled more or played on poor pitches etc these are negative values with regards to progression.

In every aspect, football has positively evolved into the sport it is today.

Sir Bobby Charlton GOAT, AMIRITE?

--------

Cashy,

How is chef-life?

Last edited by HH; 10-12-2015 at 06:17 AM. Reason: @ HOOPIE :'-(
10-12-2015 , 06:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugar Nut
Doesn't change the point of the story tho.
10-12-2015 , 06:46 AM
Is the guy who had the WR in the 100m in 1963 or whenever ~= Bolt?
10-12-2015 , 07:06 AM
apples ~= oranges?
10-12-2015 , 07:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PNHH
Is the guy who had the WR in the 100m in 1963 or whenever ~= Bolt?
he was canadian, so i guess not
10-12-2015 , 07:35 AM
Hi guys,

The seasonal international break has incubated a particular nasty virus, Human Halo AIDS, which seems to have gone airborne.

Standard protocol is to ignore it and hope it returns to NVG where it will be incubated and unable to harm civilised society.
For your and the threads safety, DO NOT engage it in debate about the relative merits of players across eras, as such debate invariably ends with all participants and onlookers contracting HH-AIDS and dying.

Best wishes,

Your friends at the WHO.
10-12-2015 , 07:44 AM
My logic is undeniable.
10-12-2015 , 07:48 AM
anything other than messi goat is just nonsense perpetrated by olds and befuddleds
10-12-2015 , 07:49 AM
Intergenerational rankings are like 99% AIDS and 1% genuinely interesting so this is not a surprising turn of events
10-12-2015 , 08:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashy
god, the "best player" discussion is so boring and always comes down to the same problem of people evaluating a players quality in absolute terms and therefore always overrating the current generation.(messi goat ainec, federer/nadal/djoko all goat lol etc etc)
But they're the GOATs of tennis, see below.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Clemens
Here is the top 50 at their respective ratings peak, using Elo logistic distribution (K=32) on sets won, from 1968 to August 2015 (2015 US Open not included).

To determine probability of a set outcome, use the following formula:
Pr (winning set) = 1/(1+10^((opponent's rating - player's rating)/400))

So, peak Agassi has 1/(1+10^(190/400)) = .251 probability of winning a set against peak Federer.

Assumptions:
1. Players initially seeded with a value of 2100.
2. Unfinished matches due to W/D, Retired, etc., are presumed a 1 set win.
3. Adjustments to ratings made after each set played.

Code:
1	Roger Federer	3003
2	Novak Djokovic	2963
3	John Mcenroe	2958
4	Rafael Nadal	2953
5	Bjorn Borg	2938
6	Ivan Lendl	2936
7	Jimmy Connors	2869
8	Andy Murray	2846
9	Pete Sampras	2828
10	Guillermo Vilas	2825
11	Thomas Muster	2818
12	Boris Becker	2817
13	Andre Agassi	2813
14	Stefan Edberg	2807
15	Mats Wilander	2804
16	Juan Martin Del Potro	2799
17	David Ferrer	2796
18	Lleyton Hewitt	2785
19	Ilie Nastase	2783
20	Arthur Ashe	2773
21	Ken Rosewall	2770
22	Tomas Berdych	2765
23	Stanislas Wawrinka	2764
24	Yannick Noah	2760
25	Gene Mayer	2754
26	Manuel Orantes	2752
27	Jose Luis Clerc	2748
28	Miloslav Mecir	2746
29	Jim Courier	2745
30	Pat Cash	2744
31	Rod Laver	2742
32	Goran Ivanisevic	2741
33	Vitas Gerulaitis	2738
34	Sergi Bruguera	2730
35	Kei Nishikori	2729
36	Jo Wilfried Tsonga	2727
37	Michael Chang	2725
38	Gustavo Kuerten	2722
39	David Nalbandian	2721
40	Raul Ramirez	2720
41	Joakim Nystrom	2716
42	Nikolay Davydenko	2715
43	John Newcombe	2714
44	Andy Roddick	2711
45	Roscoe Tanner	2710
46	Dick Stockton	2709
47	Juan Carlos Ferrero	2709
48	Robin Soderling	2708
49	Marin Cilic	2705
50	Jose Higueras	2701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Clemens
Top 50 using K=16 (slower adjustment):
Code:
1	Roger Federer	2846
2	Novak Djokovic	2828
3	John Mcenroe	2818
4	Rafael Nadal	2812
5	Bjorn Borg	2796
6	Ivan Lendl	2795
7	Jimmy Connors	2745
8	Andy Murray	2700
9	Pete Sampras	2691
10	Andre Agassi	2687
11	Boris Becker	2680
12	Guillermo Vilas	2673
13	Juan Martin Del Potro	2669
14	David Ferrer	2665
15	Stefan Edberg	2664
16	Mats Wilander	2662
17	Thomas Muster	2644
18	Lleyton Hewitt	2644
19	Ilie Nastase	2641
20	Arthur Ashe	2634
21	Gene Mayer	2628
22	Ken Rosewall	2619
23	Jim Courier	2617
24	Vitas Gerulaitis	2617
25	Tomas Berdych	2615
26	Yannick Noah	2612
27	Stanislas Wawrinka	2608
28	Manuel Orantes	2606
29	Kei Nishikori	2605
30	Miloslav Mecir	2602
31	Rod Laver	2599
32	Andy Roddick	2598
33	Jose Luis Clerc	2593
34	Goran Ivanisevic	2592
35	Stan Smith	2591
36	John Newcombe	2588
37	Michael Chang	2587
38	Jo Wilfried Tsonga	2586
39	Pat Cash	2586
40	Brian Gottfried	2583
41	Roscoe Tanner	2582
42	Gustavo Kuerten	2580
43	Raul Ramirez	2580
44	David Nalbandian	2579
45	Robin Soderling	2578
46	Sergi Bruguera	2576
47	Joakim Nystrom	2574
48	Nikolay Davydenko	2570
49	Fernando Verdasco	2565
50	Juan Carlos Ferrero	2565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Clemens
To get around the Laver underrated issue, I ran the numbers again but with 1968 starting with end of 1968 ratings. (K=16)

Laver moved up from 31 to 25, Nastase 19 to 17, and Rosewall 22 to 20.

Code:
1	Roger Federer	2846
2	Novak Djokovic	2828
3	John Mcenroe	2819
4	Rafael Nadal	2812
5	Bjorn Borg	2799
6	Ivan Lendl	2796
7	Jimmy Connors	2749
8	Andy Murray	2700
9	Pete Sampras	2691
10	Andre Agassi	2688
11	Boris Becker	2680
12	Guillermo Vilas	2677
13	Juan Martin Del Potro	2669
14	David Ferrer	2665
15	Stefan Edberg	2664
16	Mats Wilander	2662
17	Ilie Nastase	2646
18	Thomas Muster	2645
19	Lleyton Hewitt	2644
20	Ken Rosewall	2643
21	Arthur Ashe	2640
22	Gene Mayer	2630
23	Vitas Gerulaitis	2620
24	Jim Courier	2618
25	Rod Laver	2617
26	Tomas Berdych	2615
27	Yannick Noah	2614
28	Manuel Orantes	2612
29	Stanislas Wawrinka	2608
30	John Newcombe	2606
31	Kei Nishikori	2605
32	Miloslav Mecir	2603
33	Stan Smith	2602
34	Andy Roddick	2598
35	Jose Luis Clerc	2595
36	Goran Ivanisevic	2592
37	Roscoe Tanner	2587
38	Brian Gottfried	2587
39	Michael Chang	2587
40	Pat Cash	2586
41	Jo Wilfried Tsonga	2586
42	Raul Ramirez	2585
43	Gustavo Kuerten	2580
44	David Nalbandian	2579
45	Robin Soderling	2578
46	Sergi Bruguera	2577
47	Joakim Nystrom	2575
48	Cliff Drysdale	2572
49	Nikolay Davydenko	2570
50	Fernando Verdasco	2566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Clemens
Clay only (K=16, N=59,235)
Code:
1	Bjorn Borg	2836
2	Rafael Nadal	2832
3	Novak Djokovic	2710
4	Ivan Lendl	2707
5	Guillermo Vilas	2680
6	Jimmy Connors	2669
7	Jose Luis Clerc	2668
8	Thomas Muster	2654
9	Mats Wilander	2635
10	Ilie Nastase	2629
11	Roger Federer	2628
12	Yannick Noah	2621
13	David Ferrer	2616
14	Sergi Bruguera	2603
15	John Mcenroe	2590
16	Gustavo Kuerten	2585
17	Manuel Orantes	2585
18	Raul Ramirez	2570
19	Kent Carlsson	2568
20	Juan Carlos Ferrero	2559
21	Ken Rosewall	2558
22	Jim Courier	2553
23	Henrik Sundstrom	2552
24	Jose Higueras	2545
25	Victor Pecci	2544
26	Guillermo Coria	2543
27	Albert Costa	2536
28	Vitas Gerulaitis	2529
29	Andres Gomez	2529
30	Peter Mcnamara	2527
31	Gaston Gaudio	2527
32	Juan Martin Del Potro	2527
33	Eddie Dibbs	2519
34	Adriano Panatta	2519
35	Andy Murray	2518
36	Carlos Moya	2514
37	Fernando Gonzalez	2511
38	Harold Solomon	2509
39	Henri Leconte	2508
40	Andre Agassi	2506
41	Emilio Sanchez	2504
42	Robin Soderling	2501
43	Boris Becker	2501
44	Alex Corretja	2500
45	Nicolas Almagro	2495
46	Martin Jaite	2493
47	Stanislas Wawrinka	2492
48	Marcelo Rios	2492
49	Jimmy Arias	2487
50	Alberto Berasategui	2486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Clemens
Grass only (K=16, N=18,243)
Code:
1	John Mcenroe	2642
2	Jimmy Connors	2622
3	Roger Federer	2617
4	Bjorn Borg	2596
5	Pete Sampras	2554
6	Stefan Edberg	2553
7	Boris Becker	2534
8	Novak Djokovic	2525
9	Andy Murray	2525
10	Ken Rosewall	2513
11	Pat Cash	2505
12	Roscoe Tanner	2492
13	John Newcombe	2490
14	Tony Roche	2488
15	Lleyton Hewitt	2485
16	Ivan Lendl	2459
17	Stan Smith	2456
18	Rod Laver	2455
19	Guillermo Vilas	2453
20	Arthur Ashe	2450
21	Kevin Curren	2446
22	Rafael Nadal	2435
23	Brian Gottfried	2427
24	Tom Okker	2423
25	Patrick Rafter	2420
26	Andy Roddick	2419
27	Vitas Gerulaitis	2416
28	Tim Mayotte	2412
29	Ilie Nastase	2411
30	Michael Stich	2407
31	Andre Agassi	2406
32	Jan Kodes	2403
33	Hank Pfister	2403
34	Mats Wilander	2400
35	Miloslav Mecir	2400
36	Brian Teacher	2399
37	Tim Henman	2395
38	Johan Kriek	2395
39	Alex Metreveli	2394
40	Dennis Ralston	2393
41	Phil Dent	2393
42	Goran Ivanisevic	2391
43	Vijay Amritraj	2385
44	Fred Stolle	2384
45	Dick Stockton	2378
46	Richard Krajicek	2376
47	Raul Ramirez	2375
48	Roy Emerson	2375
49	Clark Graebner	2370
50	Mark Edmondson	2369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Clemens
Hard only (K=16, N=61,173)
Code:
1	Roger Federer	2773
2	Novak Djokovic	2773
3	Ivan Lendl	2713
4	Rafael Nadal	2684
5	Andre Agassi	2675
6	Pete Sampras	2674
7	John Mcenroe	2659
8	Jimmy Connors	2653
9	Stefan Edberg	2640
10	Andy Murray	2635
11	Juan Martin Del Potro	2593
12	Lleyton Hewitt	2582
13	Jim Courier	2572
14	Bjorn Borg	2568
15	Mats Wilander	2565
16	Andy Roddick	2557
17	Tomas Berdych	2557
18	David Ferrer	2549
19	Boris Becker	2542
20	Michael Chang	2538
21	Marin Cilic	2535
22	Kei Nishikori	2528
23	Nikolay Davydenko	2527
24	Jo Wilfried Tsonga	2526
25	Gene Mayer	2522
26	Thomas Enqvist	2519
27	Stanislas Wawrinka	2514
28	Ivan Ljubicic	2514
29	Brad Gilbert	2512
30	Ilie Nastase	2510
31	Miloslav Mecir	2509
32	Marcelo Rios	2505
33	Patrick Rafter	2502
34	Robin Soderling	2501
35	Fernando Verdasco	2500
36	Eliot Teltscher	2499
37	Goran Ivanisevic	2499
38	Milos Raonic	2496
39	Tommy Haas	2492
40	John Newcombe	2490
41	David Nalbandian	2489
42	James Blake	2488
43	Vitas Gerulaitis	2488
44	Guy Forget	2486
45	Gael Monfils	2485
46	Roscoe Tanner	2484
47	Richard Krajicek	2483
48	Marat Safin	2478
49	Todd Martin	2477
50	Yevgeny Kafelnikov	2476
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Clemens
Carpet only (K=16, N=19,877)
Code:
1	John Mcenroe	2735
2	Ivan Lendl	2658
3	Bjorn Borg	2623
4	Boris Becker	2610
5	Jimmy Connors	2582
6	Stefan Edberg	2526
7	Pete Sampras	2491
8	Gene Mayer	2485
9	Goran Ivanisevic	2480
10	Vitas Gerulaitis	2472
11	Brian Gottfried	2471
12	Arthur Ashe	2465
13	Tim Mayotte	2463
14	Yevgeny Kafelnikov	2462
15	Michael Stich	2433
16	Roscoe Tanner	2430
17	Dick Stockton	2428
18	Greg Rusedski	2427
19	Rod Laver	2425
20	Peter Mcnamara	2423
21	Stan Smith	2414
22	Anders Jarryd	2413
23	Richard Krajicek	2412
24	Brad Gilbert	2408
25	Tom Okker	2408
26	Guillermo Vilas	2407
27	Wojtek Fibak	2406
28	Marc Rosset	2398
29	Vijay Amritraj	2395
30	Michael Chang	2389
31	Ilie Nastase	2388
32	Andre Agassi	2387
33	Johan Kriek	2380
34	Yannick Noah	2379
35	Eddie Dibbs	2378
36	Jakob Hlasek	2378
37	Harold Solomon	2374
38	Petr Korda	2374
39	Alexander Volkov	2372
40	Peter Fleming	2370
41	Magnus Gustafsson	2370
42	Kevin Curren	2369
43	Guy Forget	2368
44	Jonas Svensson	2368
45	Magnus Larsson	2365
46	Todd Martin	2365
47	Mats Wilander	2364
48	Sandy Mayer	2362
49	Eliot Teltscher	2359
50	John Newcombe	2358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Clemens
Top 10 for all 3 major surfaces (grass, clay, hard):
-Djokovic
-Connors

Top 10 clay+grass:
-Borg
-Djokovic
-Connors

Top 10 clay+hard:
-Nadal
-Lendl
-Djokovic
-Connors

Top 10 grass+hard:
-Federer
-McEnroe
-Sampras
-Edberg
-Djokovic
-Connors

      
m