Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
English Football 2015-16 - Leicester City won the league English Football 2015-16 - Leicester City won the league

10-10-2015 , 12:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DemonOfTheFall
LOL aren't you a Tory?

Dean is Donald Trump, that came as a surprise to me I must admit. He hid it well.
I voted for Barry twice. Caught me on a particularly dick-ish morning.
10-10-2015 , 12:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBlow
Heskey and Barmby played in that game. That was just a freakish night
As much as bandit is an idiot, he's right when he says that Germany around the turn of the millennium was utter AIDS.
10-10-2015 , 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostOstrich
And yet despite all that, I still find the above quoted post way more offensive than anything I ever hear at Goodison. I hate sneering scumbags like Dean Manifest, with their condescending "capitalism is king" bull**** way more than I hate the simple, stupid people on the terraces. GTFO with that crap.
I wish I were good with words, too. This is pretty much exactly what I was trying to say in my responses to Dean.

Last edited by Sugar Nut; 10-10-2015 at 12:51 PM. Reason: correctly spelling the word "wish" could be a start.
10-10-2015 , 12:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin21
The Americans will let you know about Cleveland.

On your other point:

We have made more major tournaments in recent years

We have won the Six Nations and won a Grand Slam

We have won multiple majors in golf + had a player as #1 in the world

We even do well in cricket, wtf is that about?

We rule the world when it comes to Gaelic Football and Hurling

We have Guinness
1.Easier groups obv
2.We have less fat guys due to heroin problem
3.Scotland 55 v 3 Ireland
4.For ******s
5.Your Darts and Curling are subpar
10-10-2015 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBlow
^^^^
You said:

Quote:
Stongest national team compared with previous England teams maybe, but not relative to their opposition.
So unless in your book Germany/Spain/France/Holland/Argentina weren't considered rivals you're wrong. And as I alredy mentioned England played well vs Brazil in 2002 and were very unlucky to lose.

Quote:
Heskey and Barmby played in that game. That was just a freakish night and we still almost managed to balls up qualifying. Beckham's free kick saved us.

FFS, the ROI beat Germany the other night. That doesn't mean they should win something.
Using Heskey and Barmby as examples only makes your argument worse and comparing the ROI result to England 5-1 Germany is laughable bad. Any side can win a one off game I.E ROI but this is the first I've heard of a lucky 5-1 win which might be the greatest stretch in the history of this forum to defend an argument.
10-10-2015 , 12:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by royalblue
Guiness sucks
hot take
10-10-2015 , 12:49 PM
Nic, are you Scottish?
10-10-2015 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin21
Nic, are you Scottish?
Confirmed.
10-10-2015 , 12:51 PM
Whoa, this is an incredible development
10-10-2015 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBlow
I've got to laugh at that 'we should've beaten Brazil in 2002' comment from earlier.
Common mistake, I do it a lot, to say should've instead of could've after the event. England could've beaten Brazil. They are never should've.



You go through the list of players and yea kind of even, england might edge this actually - then the last 3 names = never should've.

Owen was actually current balon d'or though.
10-10-2015 , 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAIDS
i thought taking joy at others misfortune was like 99.95% of the point of being a sports fan
Serious question for those who are old enough: was this always the case, or is it a byproduct of the internet?
10-10-2015 , 12:56 PM
Prime Heskey has been stitched up by twighlight years Heskey.
10-10-2015 , 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin21
Nic, are you Scottish?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NicReynolds
Confirmed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin21
Whoa, this is an incredible development
Is there anything better than listening to a Scot speak? Nicol and Burley could be having the stupidest conversation in history and I'll catch myself nodding and smiling.
10-10-2015 , 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Manifest
Serious question for those who are old enough: was this always the case, or is it a byproduct of the internet?
Why do you care if you win or lose?
10-10-2015 , 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Manifest
Capitalism is king? It's like you can't mention the word unless you're crapping on it without be presumed to vote conservative (I don't) and worshiping supply-side economics (ditto). It happens to be the system we've got, and it happens to have both positive and negative outcomes for all of us. Bashing the negative (Person X has undeserved wealth usually) while soaking up the positives (doing so on an iPhone, in an air conditioned home or automobile, all three of which can be afforded on the median income or less) is a common occurrence I object to. I'll apologize again for my rude tone however.
yeah I objected to the "sure it'd be a better atmosphere if the poors could afford to get in to the games because they seem to actually care about the sport, but they can't afford it because they're too stupid so *** them" aspect of your quoted post as it was not only unnecessarily nasty but also a bad argument. You've apologised for the tone, so I'll withdraw my "scumbag" line and we can all be nice to each other.

And yes, in a bizarre paradox I can reveal I am a lifelong tory voter. I won't bore anyone with my reasoning.
10-10-2015 , 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by t3hbandit
You said:



So unless in your book Germany/Spain/France/Holland/Argentina weren't considered rivals you're wrong. And as I alredy mentioned England played well vs Brazil in 2002 and were very unlucky to lose.



Using Heskey and Barmby as examples only makes your argument worse and comparing the ROI result to England 5-1 Germany is laughable bad. Any side can win a one off game I.E ROI but this is the first I've heard of a lucky 5-1 win which might be the greatest stretch in the history of this forum to defend an argument.
I never said the 5-1 was lucky. I said it was a freakish result. For once, England played to their golden generation potential and Germany fell apart completely.

The epitome of a one off game, as the struggle to qualify despite that game proved.
10-10-2015 , 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinarocket
Im sitting in the car listening to the radio and there is this feature sponsored by a bookmaker where a football"specialist" who knows **** all comes on and tips the audience to bet on the favorites of a bunch of games tonight. He develops by explaining that said favorite is the better team therefore its the best bet.

Taking my CDs next time
lol at CDs, do you not a phone? Spotify + music apps + podcasts is the way to head.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinarocket
KW the city of cleveland hasnt won a championship in in any of the american major sports for like 50 years. Then they luckboxed lebron james in 2003 through the draft and still couldnt win a title with him
Okies. I assume lebron james was meant to be the difference?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Manifest
Serious question for those who are old enough: was this always the case, or is it a byproduct of the internet?
Derbies are the biggest games of the year and always have been. Nothing to do with the fact you can wind up your mates who support the other team.

lol at thinking it was brought on by the internet, jfc
10-10-2015 , 01:04 PM
Nothing worse then an International Break.
10-10-2015 , 01:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixfour
hot take
I'm sure many people will find it a steaming take, but I stand by it. Kilkenny >
10-10-2015 , 01:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostOstrich
yeah I objected to the "sure it'd be a better atmosphere if the poors could afford to get in to the games because they seem to actually care about the sport, but they can't afford it because they're too stupid so *** them" aspect of your quoted post as it was not only unnecessarily nasty but also a bad argument. You've apologised for the tone, so I'll withdraw my "scumbag" line and we can all be nice to each other.

And yes, in a bizarre paradox I can reveal I am a lifelong tory voter. I won't bore anyone with my reasoning.
Yup, my post was rude, unkind and stupid. I read a post that struck a chord based on a frustrating thread of conversations I've had recently IRL and responded like a moron. I completely deserve the negative backlash that ensued.

I may be wrong but I'm under the impression that the Torries haven't gone off the deep end the way American Republicans have (you can't even call them conservatives at this point). I think there are perfectly valid motivations for voting conservative if that's what the party actually is. Personally I don't feel that I have such a choice at this time in the States.
10-10-2015 , 01:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostOstrich
And yes, in a bizarre paradox I can reveal I am a lifelong tory voter. I won't bore anyone with my reasoning.
did u fancy thatcher
10-10-2015 , 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingweed
Derbies are the biggest games of the year and always have been. Nothing to do with the fact you can wind up your mates who support the other team.

lol at thinking it was brought on by the internet, jfc
That's the obvious exception to the geographic segregation of fan bases of the vast majority of clubs. I also think winding up your buddy at work about Everton-Liverpool is different than what we see online, but maybe that's not the case. Hence the question...
10-10-2015 , 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Manifest
Yup, my post was rude, unkind and stupid. I read a post that struck a chord based on a frustrating thread of conversations I've had recently IRL and responded like a moron. I completely deserve the negative backlash that ensued.
10-10-2015 , 01:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Manifest
Serious question for those who are old enough: was this always the case, or is it a byproduct of the internet?
Always the case
10-10-2015 , 01:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAIDS
did u fancy thatcher
Edwina Currie

      
m