Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
English Football 2015-16 - Leicester City won the league English Football 2015-16 - Leicester City won the league

03-07-2016 , 05:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckSauce
Just rewatched some of the nld. Amazing dier wasn't sent off. Pretty much committed worse yellow card offenses than coq.
It was a terrible bit of refereeing.
03-07-2016 , 05:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elrazor
The cut off for their data was the end of the group stage, so for analysis purposes all teams are "eliminated" at the same stage. There is no over/under representation.
no

random section of data:



you'll note that hull, villa and RANDERS FC (?) are contributing 3 or 4 games to the pre-KO column and 30+ games to the post-KO column, unlike more successful teams which get through the qualifying rounds and contribute about half of their league games to each column. this phenomenon is repeated throughout and is skewing the results.

again, what the data shows is that barca collects more league points per game than RANDERS FC et al.

pls cite BAIDS OFF OF 2P2 when you publish the refutation of this paper
03-07-2016 , 06:13 AM
btw this explains the disparity seen here:



there are way more EL qualifying games vs CL qualifying games, so there are way more EL teams in the data who didn't get through the first couple of qualifying rounds and who therefore contribute most of their games to the post-KO column. these teams tend to be ****.

this means that **** teams being overrepresented in the data is more powerful effect in the EL section of the data, which is why they reach the nonsense theory that its superbad for your league performance (-0.10 ppg) if you get KO'd from the EL.

note that the effect is also present in the CL data, it's just not quite as powerful.
03-07-2016 , 06:41 AM
To carry on Baids diabloing over ER...

The study ER linked was commissioned by UEFA and made by 2 geographers and 1 doctorate in human studies. But that's not fair so look at the actual study.

Direct quote from the report (p. 6):

"A first possible approach to measure the long-term effect of participation in UEFA club competitions consists of analysing the proportion of teams qualified for the group stage that also qualified for at least the preliminary rounds in the following season. Figure 1 below shows that group stage participation did not prevent the vast majority of clubs from all UEFA national associations from qualifying to UEFA club competitions for the next season."

Amazingly, great teams seem to qualify for European games every season -> EL/CL has no effect on ppg, QED.

You could also of course just look at Pinnacle/SBO odds for games played after EL compared to normal games...

It seems the study has lost its momentum.
03-07-2016 , 07:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAIDS
pls cite BAIDS OFF OF 2P2 when you publish the refutation of this paper
03-07-2016 , 07:31 AM
kingweed,

so it follows that the other el team livepool would be 15-25 points better off if we allow that spurs benefit less than the on average 10-15 points u claimed?
03-07-2016 , 07:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAIDS


"Figure 8: points per match in domestic leagues before and after elimination from UEFA club
competitions"

"This analysis is undertaken on clubs who belong to the 15 best ranked national associations that
were eliminated from all European Cups after the end of the group stage in December of the
six seasons surveyed"
.
This graph shows the results of teams before and after elimination in December, not what you originally said. So it's just the teams like Hull who go out, not teams like Barca that stay in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAIDS
no

random section of data:



you'll note that hull, villa and RANDERS FC (?) are contributing 3 or 4 games to the pre-KO column and 30+ games to the post-KO column
You're wandering off the original point. This data has nothing to do with the graph you originally referred to above.
03-07-2016 , 07:59 AM
So, a study commissioned by UEFA finds that participating in UEFA competitions is not detrimental for a team's domestic performance. Colour me convinced.
03-07-2016 , 08:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by t3hbandit
While I agree it's lol to put reserves out in the EL etc it's only because of the new TV deal that Spurs are the 13th richest club in the world, doubt they'd even have been top 20 for most of the last 3 decades.
Not sure about decades but for the last five years Spurs have been in this "just outside the top 10" position every time according to Deloitte. I'm aware of this bc they've typically been 1-2 places above or below us during that time but now they're pulling away due to btvditw I assume (latest edition: Spurs 12th at 260m revenue, us 13th at 220m).

Usually I lol at english teams not taking the EL seriously but in Spurs' case, it's not in order to make the top four. They're trying to win the damn league. If Schalke are ever in a position to win the league again (we won't be), I'd be glad to prioritise the league and "play the kids" in the EL
03-07-2016 , 08:13 AM
Spurs spend their riches to buy Son for 35mil, so there's that.
03-07-2016 , 08:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugar Nut
So, a study commissioned by UEFA finds that participating in UEFA competitions is not detrimental for a team's domestic performance. Colour me convinced.
This was kind of my point. People want "cold, hard data" but even scientists usually have an empirical position they are trying to defend, or find data to support.

Both the studies have methodological weaknesses in how they even approach the question. The controversial Raymond Verheijen basically finds the most easily provable recovery question possible "3-14 days recovery is better than 2 days recovery" and then uses this "finding" as support for his view.

I would guess with the CIES data, they crunched as much data as possible till they found half a dozen significant results that supported their (and UEFA's) view, and wrote it up, while probably ignoring at least as much data that suggested EL/CL did affect league results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugar Nut
Spurs spend their riches to buy Son for 35mil, so there's that.
We got Son, Toby and Alli for that.
03-07-2016 , 09:24 AM
Think he's talking euros, fella
03-07-2016 , 09:29 AM
warning, tldr boring

Spoiler:
i had a closer look at the data they supply

one example



juve 13/14 season. this data says that juve had 24 league matches 'with EC matches' competition and 14 'without EC matches'.

they were KO'd from the EL semi by benfica in may

how did the they arrive at 24/14? shouldn't it be like 34/4?

they count every league game before the group stage ends (15 in total), but thereafter they count each league game as being post-KO except the matches which immediately follow a european match.

so juve played 15 league matches pre-group stage (these are put in the pre-KO column), a match after the last group stage game (this counts as pre-KO), then a bunch of league matches in dec/jan/feb which for some reason are put in the post-KO column despite juve still being involved in europe. each match thereafter is put in the post-KO column except the ones directly following a european match, which are put in the pre-KO column.

if this sounds convoluted to you, that's because it is.

the overall effect of these shenanigans is that the longer you last in european competition, the more of your league games find their way to the 'pre-KO' column.

cliffs: the better you are, the more representation you get on the side of the ledger that UEFA would like to be larger.

imo the data supplied by the Controversial raymond verheijen is probably more reliable given that it chimes with what everyone already knows
03-07-2016 , 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAIDS
warning, tldr boring

Spoiler:
i had a closer look at the data they supply

one example



juve 13/14 season. this data says that juve had 24 league matches 'with EC matches' competition and 14 'without EC matches'.

they were KO'd from the EL semi by benfica in may

how did the they arrive at 24/14? shouldn't it be like 34/4?
Spoiler:
Gonna take a guess and say it the number of league games following/preceding a European fixture.
03-07-2016 , 09:38 AM
Spoiler:
i'll have a look at another lot & see if that's right. principle is the same either way, the longer you last and the better you are, the more games are defined as w/o euro matches and the more representation you get in the first column

Last edited by BAIDS; 03-07-2016 at 09:53 AM.
03-07-2016 , 09:42 AM
Dunno then.

Edit: Perhaps ignores when there isn't a league game following/preceding? i.e. International break
03-07-2016 , 09:52 AM
Spoiler:
dont think there are any euro games that aren't sandwiched between two league matches

arse 11/12 season shows 16/22 by my method and 20/18 by yours. in the data it's 18/20. so must be something else.

anyway it doesn't really matter, whatever dubious method is involved the end result is that better teams are overrepresented in the first column
03-07-2016 , 10:05 AM
@BAIDS
Spoiler:
the only data you're looking at is the two tables in the pdf, right? I just spent a few minute looking for, and failing to find, any SI
03-07-2016 , 10:07 AM
? pg 24 on
03-07-2016 , 10:14 AM
Are League Two games ever televised?
03-07-2016 , 11:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAIDS
? pg 24 on
that's what I meant
03-07-2016 , 11:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFC_USA
Are League Two games ever televised?
Yes.

Next one is AFC Wimbledon v Portsmouth on 28th March
03-07-2016 , 11:25 AM
I've adopted Bristol Rovers as my lower league team after my trip to their ground last season. Was hoping to find some streams of them as the playoff race gets tighter. Thanks
03-07-2016 , 11:28 AM
All of the playoff games are televised, so if they do make it you'll be able to watch those.
03-07-2016 , 11:32 AM


Think they even show all the Wembley finals on tv here, but good to know I can find some good streams for the Pirates playoff run

      
m