Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
English Football 2015-16 - Leicester City won the league English Football 2015-16 - Leicester City won the league

02-11-2016 , 06:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by therightdeal
City would have won the league had they signed Terry claims Redknob.

He would have been great at set pieces. He would have marked Leicester out of the game.

He in no way has contributed to Chelsea being awful.
Or if Kompany could have played...maybe he isn't his old self, but the others don't really cut it.
02-11-2016 , 07:23 AM
Now there's rumours that TSO is getting three year contract at ManU, but actually why don't they give him two year contract and then part ways no matter how good he does? There's clear history that he always screws up on the third year.
02-11-2016 , 08:35 AM
I hope he fails gloriously in the first season this time if this is true

Also idk how United fans feel about this, but I think there is already a couple of season worth of "Mou damage" being done at the club as we stand, so now they should look for someone who would build for longterm instead of a quick trophy smash and grab (if they can spend money on not Depays)
02-11-2016 , 08:47 AM
Holy ****, Twitter has just shown me bentekedog.gif.

Spoiler:
02-11-2016 , 08:50 AM
I think the whole "build for longterm" is an idea that a lot of United fans/shareholders are still having trouble getting their heads around.
02-11-2016 , 09:29 AM
It kinda is sad that United's financial results get so much media attention. A better product out on the pitch will do me fine.

Also on another note - that Irish MF playing for Peterborough last night looked really good. He should be making a step up next season. With some of the dort in our squad he prob could get a look in for MON.
02-11-2016 , 09:41 AM
bentekedog will never beat carrollhorse, pretty good though
02-11-2016 , 10:20 AM
Speaking of momentum, if it's real how come City are clear favs vs Spurs this weekend?
02-11-2016 , 10:22 AM
Bojan has signed a new deal. Stated that the club's great history, a love of the local cuisine and the attractiveness of female Stoke residents as the key force behind his decision.
02-11-2016 , 10:32 AM
same people saying they don't care about the financials are the ones who would (or do) complain when we miss out on player x, y or z for money reasons

pure Liverpool
02-11-2016 , 10:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lars1
Speaking of momentum, if it's real how come City are clear favs vs Spurs this weekend?
speaking of momentum, if it's not real how come City are a smaller favorite vs Spurs this weekend that they normally would be?
02-11-2016 , 10:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOOM BUST ROBOT
same people saying they don't care about the financials are the ones who would (or do) complain when we miss out on player x, y or z for money reasons

pure Liverpool
Are you saying that the Liverplopisation of Manchester United is complete?
02-11-2016 , 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashy
speaking of momentum, if it's not real how come City are a smaller favorite vs Spurs this weekend that they normally would be?
more complete information about how good we think spurs are and how much worse City are than we thought they were.
02-11-2016 , 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by joejoe1337
Bojan has signed a new deal.
great. btvditw
02-11-2016 , 10:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopie1
Are you saying that the Liverplopisation of Manchester United is complete?
trying my damnedest to mentally repress the very notion
02-11-2016 , 11:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashy
speaking of momentum, if it's not real how come City are a smaller favorite vs Spurs this weekend that they normally would be?
what joejoe said.

city still clear favs despite bad momentum and going up against a team who has the best away form momentum in the league.
02-11-2016 , 11:23 AM
oh didn't think you were actually serious lol

in short:
momentum is a very real and mayor variable, but there are other variables which are far more important(quality of the team LDO)
02-11-2016 , 11:25 AM
Hey everton peeps dafuq is going on with bainesy. Don't see any info about injuries, any particular reason he's getting benched?
02-11-2016 , 11:32 AM
yeah momentum is real, but there is no way to prove it.
02-11-2016 , 11:41 AM
there is no proof that human's aren't emotionless robots? interesting.
02-11-2016 , 11:46 AM
no way to prove that it has a significant impact on performance, and even if it did (which I concede it might), how one could go about quantifying it.

Last edited by joejoe1337; 02-11-2016 at 11:47 AM. Reason: edit: or even expressing it on any way, numerically or not
02-11-2016 , 11:50 AM
I like how the goalposts have seemingly been shifted from 'not real' to 'not provable or quantifiable'. the latter benchmark of course ruling out around 99.9% of football discussion other than who scored more goals or something.
02-11-2016 , 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by joejoe1337
no way to prove that it has a significant impact on performance, and even if it did (which I concede it might), how one could go about quantifying it.
there isn't really a way to proof that physical difference have a significant impact either is there?
yet we all agree that running faster or controlling a ball better is indeed very valuable
02-11-2016 , 12:00 PM
there is: the team with the blokes that run faster and control the ball better win more
02-11-2016 , 12:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashy
there is no proof that human's aren't emotionless robots? interesting.
If momentum is a real and mayor variable, but at the same time it's not possible to isolate it from other variables, how do you even know it's real?

      
m