Quote:
Originally Posted by Kneel B4 Zod
yeah, either way he *wants* to score. but in 1 scenario he *needs* to score, and in the other not scoring isn't horrible b/c he may get the ball back
the possibility of a tie can very well give you different risk profiles for certain plays/situations, particularly for a team lagging behind in the playoff race
I'm not saying this effects them on every single play, or even that it certainly affected them yesterday, I'm just saying that it's important for the QB to be aware of the rule so he knows when it's appropriate to be more aggresive
The aggressive part needs to be looked at more. I know its more obvious now that the Cowboys won last night, but a tie was a horrible result for the Eagles. Being in the position they were they needed to win that game. Being 6-4 was almost necessary considering the playoff circumstances.
Reid needed to be telling McNabb that they needed to be taking shots down field and that they had to score. This was a game they had to have. I'm not saying a tie was a bad as a loss....but I think in their situation its pretty close. Unless I'm missing something with the upcoming schedules and the math. Maybe someone smarter than me can get on that.
Either way, I thought it was a non-issue before, but after thinking about it and knowing the situation, I think it may have been detrimental to the teams success in that game and in this season that McNabb didn't know the situation...but with that said, if McNabb didn't know, wouldn't someone in that offensive huddle say something?
He has to be leveling us...this is so f'ing dumb.