Quote:
Originally Posted by GusJohnsonGOAT
Yeah, I don't like this reasoning at all. It's being completely results oriented. Basically it's be decided "well, he doesn't have an advantage with these legs, so he is good to run."
So what happens to future participants that want to run like this? What if he was beating out other runners? It also takes away a spot from someone else who could be competing.
It's a nice story, but being sentimental is almost never the correct decision for sports.
+1. Yeah, relying on his times and saying, "well he's not fast enough, so he can compete" is almost the worst possible justification for allowing him to compete.
The problem is what he is doing, i.e., hopping around on those carbon blades is not running. It looks similar, and for someone with no legs it is the closest analog that he can manage. But this is a running competition, and he's doing something else.