Quote:
Originally Posted by CopTHIS
No it's not bollocks. There is a difference between all-time great stats and all-time great players. I mean, he is a great player no doubt but would you seriously put him in an all-time test XI? No chance. For one thing, he wouldn't bowl much if at all in such a team so you'd really have to pick him on his batting.
I mean, I saw his Test debut series and used to be a bit of a fan. He even played for my first class team. But I've lost track of the number of times he has batted like he is incapable, or just not willing, to change his game for the match situation. I've seen Gilchrist caught on the boundary or stumped just before a declaration about a dozen times. Kallis hasn't done it once. One time in Oz, all he did was jab a single and let the other batter throw the bat - even when two of them were players under pressure for their places. Even the SA commentators (and let's face it, SA cricket has an ingrained streak of negativity) thought he was utterly out of order. And how many games has he won, clearly making the difference? Maybe the current test if SA pull it off, but not as may as guys like Lara.
So yes, great player, but you have to look beyond pure averages. He'd have been a better player if he was more flexible and averaged 5-8 runs less as a result.
Gibbs recently released his controversial autobiography called "To the point". He seems to have a similar view about Kallis: brilliantly talented player, but puts himself ahead of the team sometimes.
Gibbs says he asked Kallis why as a senior player he didn't offer encouragement and advice on the field or in team meetings, and Kallis replied just the way he thought he would - he smiled and said nothing.
But then again... Kallis' record and consistency speaks for itself, and this latest innings, carrying his injuries and carrying his bat, was awesome....
He is now the only South African to score a hundred in each innings twice, and takes his career test centuries up to 40 (#2 all-time behind Sachin).