Quote:
Originally Posted by CopTHIS
I agree about Watson actually. Of all the urgent problems you have, him opening isn't really one oif them. Who cares if he doesn't fit the traditional view of an opener, look at Sehwag.
Difference between Sehwag and Watson is that Sehwag goes on and makes tons, big ones. And double tons. And two triples. He's made 22 tons and 27 fifties, which is a pretty fine conversion rate. Of his 22 tons, 14 of them are over 150.
By comparison, Watson has 2 tons and 15 fifties. And of those 15 fifties, he's failed to get past 65 on 9 occasions. It's an appalling conversion rate. His batting is ideally suited to muscular, fast-paced cameos down the order, but that then probably needs to be in conjunction with a bigger role as a main part of the attack, not as a fill-in bowler. You certainly wouldn't ever want to find yourself having to rely on him to be the man who defies all-comers and save the team's innings from the rubble, as has been done by all the other top-six batsmen on both sides (save for Hughes, I'm assuming the injured Katich in his place instead there).
The trouble is that the Aussies can't just sweep away their entire batting lineup and throw in half a dozen new faces who have little or no experience. If Michael Clarke is no longer seen as heir apparent to the captaincy then Ponting should probably stay in until they find someone and Clarke should be dropped from the team. Hussey should also be retained, unless he chooses to retire. You need a blend of youth and experience in there.
Steven Smith is not top-six material, and isn't good enough as a leggie to form major part of the attack (at least not yet). Assuming Katich comes back, you need another opener (assuming Hughes also gets the chop), Watson down to six (and more bowling from him instead) and another name in the middle order, while retaining Hussey and Ponting. Although I don't knowmuch about them, obviously, the names I've heard most are Khawaja and Ferguson, and perhaps they should both get a go at Sydney next week.